DISCOVERY AND VALIDATION OF A NEW CLASSIFICATION OF ANA-RMDS THAT BETTER PREDICT LONG-TERM OUTCOMES COMPARED TO LEGACY DIAGNOSES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
O015 / #174 Topic: AS20 - Precision Medicine ABSTRACT CONCURRENT SESSION 02: SLE METRICS – IMPROVING OUTCOMES & MEASURES 22-05-2025 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM Background/Purpose ANA-associated RMDs (ANA-RMDs) include SLE, Sjogren’s, Scleroderma, Myositis, and mixed/undifferentiated CTD. Despite overlapping clinical and immunophenotypic features, there is significant disparity in access to targeted therapies across ANA-RMDs. A robust data-driven reclassification using clinical and biomarker data with clinical impact could define more homogeneous cohorts for therapies and clinical trials. Methods We trained a variational autoencoder with the European PRECISESADS cohort of 876 ANA-RMD patients using R, keras, and tensorflow. 25 covariates were prioritized by ANA-RMD specialists and patient focus groups. Data was compressed to an 8-neuron latent space and analyzed with multiple clustering techniques. For validation, K-means centroids from PRECISESADS were applied to the DEFINITION dataset (219 patients) (Figure 1). Cluster durability was assessed using entropy, elbow plots, and cluster stability index. Gene expression data was analyzed with heatmaps and summary statistics. Clinical impact in DEFINITION was analyzed cross-sectionally and longitudinally using descriptive statistics, PROs (eg, SF36), physician assessments (eg, BILAG-2004, PGA), and gene expression scores. 5-year follow-up outcomes included hospitalization rates. Kaplan-Meier and Sankey plots were generated with survival and flipPlots R packages. Figure 1. Results Deep learning revealed 5 distinct ANA-RMD classes. Each class encompassed patients from various legacy diagnoses, with no single legacy diagnosis mapping to a new class. These classes were: (i) Sicca, mostly patients with a legacy diagnosis of pSS, SLE, or UCTD with low disease activity but high IFN-I expression (Figure 2); (ii) Quiescent, characterized by low gene expression and physician-assessed disease activity but high patient-reported pain scores; (iii) Active MSK disease, with high MSK disease activity and high inflammatory gene expression; (iv) Polyinflammatory, with high levels of therapeutic change, PRO impact, and high myeloid/interferon/inflammatory gene expression, containing substantial numbers of previously undifferentiated patients; (v) Myeloinflammatory, with high healthcare utilization, physician-assessed disease activity, and emergency department attendance (Figure 3). Five-year healthcare data revealed significant differences in hospital admission rates (p<0.01) and emergency department attendance (p<0.01) for the new classes but not for legacy diagnoses. Figure 2. Figure 3. Conclusions Using advanced deep learning, we developed and validated a new classification for ANA-RMDs. Our findings showed that (i) more of the ANA-RMD spectrum could be classified than with legacy diagnoses; (ii) immunophenotypic and clinical features within these classes were more homogeneous than with legacy diagnoses, suggesting suitability for the same therapies and outcomes; (iii) these classes better predicted long-term outcomes and healthcare utilization. Clinical trials in these populations may yield larger effect sizes and provide evidence applicable to more patients, thereby reducing healthcare inequality.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».