35 Viral disease alters feed preferences in grower pigs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) virus reduces feed intake and growth rates and increases mortality risk in pigs. During this disease state, it is unclear if macronutrient and feed preferences change to support the immune response. Our objective was to evaluate how diet composition impacts feeding preferences during PRRS. In Exp. 1, pigs were offered a choice between a corn-soybean meal (CON) and a CON + 3.75% glucose and fructose high sugar (HS) diet. In Exp. 2, pigs were offered both CON and CON plus functional amino acids (10–20% increase in methionine, threonine, and tryptophan; FAA) diets. In Exp. 3, pigs were presented with CON, a high-protein diet (28% increase in CP; HCP), or a high-fat diet (20% increased metabolizable energy; ME) diets. Each experiment contained six pens of mixed-sex pigs (40 ± 5.5 kg) that were randomly allotted to pens (Exp. 1 and 2 contained three pigs/pen, Exp. 3 contained four pigs/pen). On day post inoculation (dpi) 0, one pig/pen was inoculated intramuscularly with a live PRRS virus. Body weights and feed disappearance were recorded weekly (-1 week post-inoculation [wpi] and at 1, 2, and 3 wpi) to calculate ADG, ADFI, and feed preference. Feed preference was expressed as the percentage of each tested diet relative to total feed intake. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with the fixed effect of wpi and wpi by diet. As expected, ADFI decreased (P< 0.001) in Exp. 1 (2.17, 2.27, 1.74 and 2.16 kg/d), Exp. 2 (2.10, 2.06, 1.62 and 1.92 kg/d), and Exp. 3 (1.64, 1.93, 1.53, and 1.96 kg/d) over wpi. In Exp. 1, ADG and G:F did not differ by wpi. Over the challenge period, ADG decreased by up to 50% (P< 0.05) in Exp. 2 and 3. In Exp. 2, G:F tended to decrease during 2 wpi compared to -1 and 1 wpi, recovering by 3 wpi (P=0.08), and did not differ for Exp. 3 (P=0.114). In Exp. 1, HS diets were preferred over CON in wpi -1 and 1 wpi (84% vs. 16%, respectively); however, by wpi 2 and 3, HS preference decreased to 55% compared to 45% for CON (P=0.015). Across all wpi, HS diets were preferred over CON (69% vs. 31%, P=0.001). In Exp. 2, no diet by wpi was reported. However, overall, the CON was preferred over FAA (63% and 37%, respectively, P=0.02). No wpi by diet interaction was reported in Exp. 3 (P=0.17). However, overall, the HCP and ME were preferred over CON (42, 36, and 22%, respectively, P=0.003). In conclusion, pigs prefer diets containing natural sweeteners, higher crude protein, or energy during peak PRRS. Further research is needed to determine if this is driven by olfactory or gustatory factors.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».