99 Growth performance of grow-finish pigs fed different levels of soybean meal in non-isocaloric diets with provisions of digestible amino acids above estimated requirements
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract An experiment was conducted to determine the performance of grow-finish pigs fed 1 of 4 diets with graded levels of soybean meal (SBM) formulated to investigate two potential confounding factors in evaluating increased dietary inclusion of SBM. First, diets were not formulated to be isocaloric; therefore, lower G:F was expected with reduced dietary net energy in high SBM diets. Secondly, diets were formulated to partially ameliorate the potential confounding effect of greater digestible amino acids (AA) in high SBM diets. The SBM levels were defined for the low treatment by least-cost formulation with no restrictions on crystalline AA (L-Lys, DL-Met, L-Thr, L-Trp, L-Val, and L-Ile). The high SBM diets within each phase were formulated to meet standardized ileal digestible (SID) AA requirements with no crystalline L-Lys. The SBM levels in the 2 intermediate treatments were equally spaced between the high and low treatments. After defining the SBM levels for each diet, crystalline AA were added to the lower SBM diets to be closer to or match the SID Thr, Trp, Ile, and Val present in the highest SBM treatment. A total of 1,042 pigs [28.7 ± 0.3 kg; mixed sex; PIC 337] were allotted to 12 replicate pens per treatment (21 – 22 pigs per pen) and randomly allotted within location block to treatment. A 6-phase feeding program was managed according to pre-determined feed budgets, and pigs were weighed by pen approximately every other week. Data were analyzed using the lme4 package of R 4.1.2, and the model included the fixed effect of treatment and the random effect of block. Linear and quadratic contrast statements were used to test the effects of increasing SBM in diets. Data are presented in combined weigh periods (Table 1). Average body weight was not different at any time point, including final body weight. In period 1 (day 0-30), no differences in average daily gain (ADG) or average daily feed intake (ADFI) were detected; however, feed efficiency (G:F) was improved (linear, P < 0.05) with greater inclusion of SBM. In period 2 (day 30-63), ADG and G:F increased (quadratic, P < 0.05) with greater inclusion of SBM. In period 3 (day 63-99), G:F was reduced (quadratic, P < 0.05), driven by increased ADFI (linear, P < 0.05). With opposing performance responses observed between early and later periods, no differences in performance were detected overall. In conclusion, greater SBM in non-isocaloric diets improved G:F in early growth periods, but not in late finishing. The improved G:F observed in the first two periods was contrary to the hypothesis and could be due to greater net energy in SBM than expected, greater provisions of AA beyond Lys, Met, Thr, Trp, Val, and Ile, or something else.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».