LOSING SIGHT OF THE DIAGNOSIS: A CASE REPORT OF NEUROMYELITIS OPTICA SPECTRUM DISEASE AND SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS-NEUROAUTOIMMUNITY IN FOCUS, CORRELATION OR COINCIDENCE?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PV284 / #590 Case Report Poster Topic: AS05 - CNS Lupus Introduction Optic Neuritis is a rare, albeit, severe manifestation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). It causes immune-mediated inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), leading to demyelination and vision loss. It is also a prominent feature of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disease (NMOSD), which can affect both the optic nerves and the spinal cord. These 2 conditions share overlapping traits, causing neurologic manifestations that complicate the diagnosis and may require distinct therapeutic approach, especially in refractory cases.[1] Case Presentation With Investigation A 64-year-old female with a medical history of arterial hypertension and mild thrombocytopenia, first noted 4 years ago, presented with progressively deteriorating vision loss that began 2 months before her visit. Ophthalmological examination revealed severe loss of visual acuity: only light perception in the right eye and finger counting at 2 meters in the left, with no signs of inflammation or macular edema on fundoscopy. Brain CT and CT-A revealed no significant abnormalities other than a mild narrowing of the right internal carotid artery (22%). Clinical examination, aside from vision loss, was unremarkable Laboratory findings revealed mild thrombocytopenia (PLT: 80×10^3), normal inflammatory markers (ESR:18 mm/1st h; CRP:1.8 mg/L), urinalysis and biochemical panel. T2-weighted brain MRI demonstrated mild enhancement of the right optic nerve near the optic canal, consistent with optic neuritis (Figure 1). Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed normal cell count. Serologic testing revealed elevated anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies (32× ULN), hypocomplementemia (C3:73.7 mg/dL; C4:10 mg/dL) and high anti-dsDNA binding (2× ULN). A diagnosis of coexistent NMOSD and SLE was established. Treatment with pulses of glucocorticoids and Rituximab led to mild visual improvement (left eye: 8/10; right eye: 2/10) and resolution of thrombocytopenia (PLT: 326×10^3). The patient received maintenance therapy with Rituximab plus Azathioprine and was tapered of steroids succesfully. No relapses were observed over a 2-year follow-up period. Repeat brain MRI showed atrophy of the right optic nerve without active inflammation or new lesions (Figure 2). Figure 1: T2-weighted axial orbital brain MRI (fat suppression) Figure 2: T2-weighted axial brain MRI. Consent for publication obtained directly from patient. Literature Review Optic neuritis, as a manifestation of NMOSD, is associated with systemic autoimmune disorders such as SLE, and may also present alongside transverse myelitis. It is often linked with specific antibodies against Aquaporin-4 (AQP-4) or against Myelin-Oligodendrocyte-Glycoprotein (MOG).[1] NMOSD presents with longitudinally extensive myelitis lesions and lacks systemic involvement, which is commonly seen in SLE. Both conditions require treatment with high doses of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive therapy, but first-line treatments differ. First-line treatment for NMOSD includes biologic therapies such as Eculizumab (anti-C-5a), Inebilizumab (anti-CD19), Satralizumab (anti-Interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor) and Plasma Exchange. In contrast, CNS SLE therapy includes cyclophosphamide and Rituximab in refractory cases.[1,2] Discussion This case highlights the complex coexistence of NMOSD and SLE, 2 distinct autoimmune diseases that may overlap. While optic neuritis is a common manifestation of NMOSD, its occurrence in SLE is rare, leading to diagnostic confusion. Early recognition and appropriate management are crucial for preventing irreversible organ damage and improving overall prognosis. Effective treatment hinges on identifying the predominant disease in each clinical setting and prompts further inquiry into the overlapping characteristics of these conditions. References: [1.] Ochi MGS. Case Rep Rheumatol 2020;2020:8820071. [2.] Adawi M. Clin Med Insights Case Rep 2014;7:41-7.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».