THE OCCURRENCE OF DISCOID LUPUS ERYTHROMATOSUS PROGRESSING TO SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS, WITH OVERLAPPING ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS, AND RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PRESENTING AS PAPULAR-PURPURIC GLOVE AND SOCK SYNDROME
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PV285 / #617 Case Report Poster Topic: AS07 - Cutaneous Lupus Introduction Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE), particularly discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), is usually the most disfiguring of the lupus erythematosus (LE) – specific skin lesions. It manifests with sharply-demarcated skin lesions that are photosensitive. While it physically causes scarring, systemic involvement is rare. In certain cases, however, DLE may be part of, or may progress to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The occurrence of concomitant DLE and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), DLE and ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (AAV) have only been reported in a few cases. There are also more cases of overlap syndromes occurring in subacute and acute LE, rather than in the discoid subtype. The paucity of local data in the Philippines and Southeast Asia also adds to the diagnostic dilemma. Finally, the role of a viral infection prompting papular-purpuric glove and sock syndrome (PPGSS) in heralding a CTD remains to be determined. Case Presentation With Investigation We present the case of 28-year-old female, with known history of papular-purpuric glove and sock syndrome attributed to systemic viral infection occurring 2 years prior. She presented to the emergency room with a chief complaint of fever and rash. Accompanying symptoms included unintentional weight loss, joint pain, muscle pain, alopecia, with marked headache upon sun exposure, and photosensitive discoid rashes. PE showed scarring alopecia and generalized discoid rashes with raised, erythematosus plaques and adherent scales on the scalp, face, neck, cheeks, nose, ears, and upper lip. Both hands showed signs of active synovitis. Despite the presence of discoid lesions, and absence of the traditional acute cutaneous lesions, patient progressed to SLE. She presented with the following criteria: fever, hemolytic anemia with direct Coomb’s positivity, oral ulcers, arthritis, and hypocomplementemia, satisfying the ACR/EULAR 2019 Criteria for SLE. Morning stiffness and hand joint deformities typical of RA prompted RF testing, which turned out to be seropositive. c-ANCA was likewise seropositive at 1:80. Infection and malignancy were ruled out. Patient was started on corticosteroids and conventional synthetic DMARDs which prompted resolution of fever, rash, and arthritis. While discoid skin lesions remain permanent, her disease activity is presently quiescent. Literature Review CCLE encompasses wide range of dermatologic manifestations which may or may not include systemic disease, and some cutaneous manifestations, these includes discoid lupus erythromatosus, lupus erythematosus profundus, chilblain cutaneous lupus, and lupus tumidus, which may incidentally include systemic disease that would provide clinical clues, signs, and symptoms for MCTD or an overlap syndrome. Early signs and symptoms may involve hands, fingers, fingertips. Although dermatologic manifestations are common and may occur at initial presentation, skin lesions vary in morphology like cutaneous nodules, macular eruptions, and ecchymoses. SLE and RA overlap, termed “Rhupus Syndrome” is rare, and is estimated to be prevalent in 1% of patients with RA, the occurrence of DLE and AAV also affects a range of internal organs which are managed with high-dose glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants and targeted biologic medications. Discussion While CCLE lesions usually remain limited to cutaneous involvement, vigilance should always be exercised due to its possible progression to SLE. Likewise, confirmation of SLE, if with concomitant symptoms typical of another CTD, should prompt further workup. In this case, our patient presented with an overlap syndrome, comprised of SLE, RA, and AAV. The role of a prior PPGSS remains unknown. Our case highlights the need to have high index of suspicion for overlapping syndromes, especially in The Philippines, which is developing and is resource-limited.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».