MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4410714583 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.45122

USING A NOVEL PSYCHOSOCIAL GROUP INTERVENTION TO IMPROVE ADAPTION, COPING AND MENTAL HEALTH OUTCOMES FOLLOWING DYSVASCULAR LIMB AMPUTATIONS: A FEASIBILITY STUDY

2025· article· en· W4410714583 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Rosalie Steinberg, Lawrence R. Robinson, O Kachmarchuk, Sharon Jankey, Stephanie Posa, A L Mayo, Mindy Simon, Alexander Kiss, Crystal MacKay, Robert Simpson, Marina B. Wasilewski, Steven Dilkas, Sander L. Hitzig

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Établissements canadiensPublic Health OntarioQueen's UniversitySt. John's Rehab HospitalWest Park Healthcare CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook HospitalHealth Sciences Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychosocialMedicinePhysical therapyAnxietyRehabilitationRandomized controlled trialCoping (psychology)Mental healthGroup psychotherapyDepression (economics)PsychiatrySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Individuals with lower extremity amputations (LEA) often face high rates of depression and anxiety that hinder their rehabilitation and post-discharge coping. Group therapy is a clinically and cost-effective way to address these mental health challenges, but evidence for its use with LEA inpatients is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a psychosocial group therapy intervention for individuals with dysvascular LEA undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. METHODOLOGY: This randomized controlled trial randomly assigned dysvascular LEA rehabilitation inpatients into a supportive-expressive group therapy (SEGT) or a treatment as usual (TAU) group. The SEGT intervention, a form of group therapy adapted from outpatient medical settings, consisted of six one-hour sessions held twice weekly over a three-week period. Participants completed baseline, exit and three-month surveys assessing the study’s secondary outcomes of SEGT effectiveness on depression, anxiety, coping, body image, health, and community participation. The main outcomes assessed recruitment, survey completion, treatment adherence, and participant retention rates. Interviews and a focus group were completed to obtain feedback on the intervention. FINDINGS: Twenty-five participants were recruited, with 12 randomly assigned to the SEGT group, and 13 to the TAU group. The average number of sessions attended by SEGT participants was 3.9 (SD = 2.1). The survey completion rates for all participants were 84% (21/25) for the baseline assessment, 64% (18/25) for discharge, and 44% (11/25) for the three-month follow-up. The SEGT group showed a significant improvement in anxiety and depression scores (p = 0.02). SEGT was well-received by participants and staff. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a larger pragmatic SEGT trial is feasible, despite a small sample size and implementation challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, given this study achieved moderate rates of recruitment, retention, and survey completion. Several critical insights were gained on how to optimize an inpatient group therapy intervention for dysvascular LEA populations in rehabilitative settings. Layman's Abstract People who have undergone lower limb amputations often experience high rates of anxiety and depression, making it harder for them to recover from surgery and transition back home. Group therapy has been shown to improve the mental health of many patient populations, but it has not been widely studied in persons with lower limb loss in hospital settings. This project tested whether a group therapy program would be feasible for persons with lower limb loss who are undergoing hospital based rehabilitation. The therapy program consisted of six sessions over a three week period. Participants were either randomly assigned to the group therapy sessions or to a treatment as usual condition (no group therapy). We recruited 25 participants: 12 assigned to the group therapy sessions and 13 to the treatment as usual group. The average number of group therapy sessions attended by participants was 3.9 sessions, and individuals that attended the group sessions showed improvements in anxiety and depression scores. The survey completion rates for all participants were 84% for the baseline assessment, 64% for discharge, and 44% for the three-month follow-up. Follow-up interviews with patients who took part in the group therapy revealed they found it to be helpful for the mental well-being, and hospital staff shared some suggestions on how to optimize its’ delivery. Overall this study found that running an in-hospital group therapy program for individuals with limb loss is feasible. The project also provided valuable insights on how to improve any future group therapy studies for people with limb loss. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/45122/33962 How To Cite: Steinberg R.J, Robinson L.R, Kachmarchuk O, Jankey S, Posa S, Mayo A.L, et al. Using a novel psychosocial group intervention to improve adaption, coping and mental health outcomes following dysvascular limb amputations: A feasibility study. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2025; Volume 8, Issue 1, No. 4. Https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.45122 Corresponding Author: Dr. Rosalie J. Steinberg, MSc, MD, FRCPCAffiliation: St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.E-Mail: rosalie.steinberg@sunnybrook.caORCID ID: Https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-1378Telephone: 1-416-480-4089

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai non randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,023

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,313
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalMême sujetProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsTravaux en français237 207