Roles of dentistry in identifying and supporting individuals who have experienced gender-based violence: a scoping review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Gender-based violence (GBV) is a significant public health concern affecting one in three women globally. GBV is deeply rooted in gender inequality and societal constructs of gender roles, which significantly contribute to its prevalence and impact on women. Injury to the head, face, and neck, including broken teeth and jaws, is common in GBV, as is dental neglect, indicating a role for dental care. However, the impact of maxillofacial injuries or poor oral health and the role dental professionals may play in supporting individuals experiencing GBV are often overlooked. This review aimed to explore the research question: What is known in the literature about the roles of dentistry in identifying and supporting individuals who have experienced GBV? Approach: A search strategy including dental care and GBV-related text words and subject headings was developed and run across seven databases. Searches were not limited by date, location, or language. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they (1) described or evaluated provision of, need for, or outcomes of dental care; AND (2) focused on individuals who had experienced GBV aged 18+. Data were extracted from articles meeting inclusion criteria and narrative synthesis used to describe and synthesise findings. Results: 84 articles met inclusion criteria, predominantly published in the United States and focused on dental care providers' knowledge, perceptions, and actions related to GBV. Only four identified articles looked at dental care interventions tailored to GBV. Individuals who experienced GBV were found to experience high rates of maxillofacial injury because of the violence. They also reported more oral health issues, negative perceptions of their teeth, and irregular dental visits than individuals who have not experienced GBV. Dental professionals were generally underprepared to support individuals experiencing GBV, but training interventions proved effective in increasing knowledge and competency. Overall, the literature supported a need for dental care in GBV and a tailored approach to supporting individuals who have experienced GBV. Conclusion: GBV can have profound impacts on oral health. There is a lack of knowledge about GBV in dental settings and the need to include GBV in dental curricula and further training is often overlooked. Policies and mandatory guidelines are necessary to ensure that GBV education and training are integrated into dental care settings. Trauma-informed dental care, integration of dental care into GBV support settings, and broader awareness of GBV among dental care providers are also needed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».