Kidney health outcomes in children born very prematurely compared to full-term counterparts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Advances in neonatal care have improved survival rates in preterm neonates. However, concerns persist regarding the long-term kidney implications of prematurity. Nephrogenesis is disrupted, particularly in those born very preterm (≤ 32 weeks of gestation), increasing the risk of early kidney dysfunction and hypertension later in life. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate kidney health outcomes in former very preterm children and adolescents compared to full-term peers. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from their earliest available records to October 9, 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included observational studies comparing kidney health parameters between children/adolescents born very preterm (gestational age - GA ≤ 32 weeks) and their full-term counterparts (gestational age > 36 weeks or birth weight > 2000 g) within the age range of 6 to 18 years. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Children and adolescents aged 6-18 years born very preterm were compared to their full-term counterparts. The analyzed kidney function markers included serum Cystatin C, serum creatinine (sCr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on sCr (Cr-eGFR), and blood pressure (systolic and diastolic, SBP/DBP). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. The mean difference with 95% confidence intervals was used for continuous outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Sensitivity, subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted for further exploration of the outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using R software (Version 4.3.2). RESULTS: ; 95%CI: -22.44 to -1.31), and higher SBP (1.96 mmHg; 95%CI: 0.21-3.71). Sensitivity analysis confirmed Cystatin C findings but rendered Cr-eGFR and SBP differences non-significant. Subgroup analysis showed a significant GA effect on sCr (p < 0.0001), though the ≥ 28 weeks subgroup included only two studies. LIMITATIONS: Considerable heterogeneity across studies persisted despite sensitivity and subgroup analyses. The lack of randomized controlled trials and longitudinal studies limits result interpretation, while non-significant meta-regression findings hinder full explanation of heterogeneity. Insufficient data prevented the assessment of additional kidney function parameters. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Cystatin C was elevated in very preterm individuals compared to full-term peers, reinforcing its role as an early marker of kidney dysfunction. While differences in Cr-eGFR and SBP lost significance after sensitivity analysis, these markers remain relevant for long-term follow-up in this vulnerable population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD42024554702).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,024 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».