Usability and Impact of the Web-Based Dementia Foundations Educational Program in Personal Support Workers (PSWs), PSW Trainees, and Care Companions: Quasi-Experimental Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Personal support workers (PSWs) are often expected to provide ongoing support for complex conditions and have identified an increased need for training in several areas, including dementia and mental health. Web-based interventions may be helpful complements to traditional in-person continuing education and training, but their effectiveness must be explored further. Objective: This study's objective was to evaluate the usability, usefulness, satisfaction with, and effectiveness of the web-based Dementia Foundations Program among unregulated care providers who provide care to persons living with dementia or are in training. Methods: A cohort of 50 PSWs, PSW trainees, and paid care companions from 3 recruitment sites were invited to access the Dementia Foundations Program, a 4-hour self-paced web-based program composed of 4 courses, for up to 6 weeks. Usability, usefulness, and satisfaction were assessed using surveys after each course and following the program. Dementia knowledge and attitudes were measured using the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale and the Dementia Attitudes Scale, with differences between baseline and postprogram scores analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the program. Of the 50 participants, 46 (92%) agreed that the web-based training met their expectations, 47 (94%) agreed that the training covered a broad range of topics and was not missing any important content, and 49 (98%) agreed that the web-based training would benefit them. There was a significant postprogram improvement in dementia knowledge as measured by the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale, with an average 30% improvement across all cohorts. Dementia Attitudes Scale scores were also significantly improved postprogram across all cohorts. Conclusions: This pilot study in PSWs, PSW trainees, and unregulated care companions demonstrated high satisfaction levels with the web-based Dementia Foundations Program. There were substantial improvements in knowledge and small improvements in attitudes for participants, and it was perceived as a useful tool that complemented their existing education and training. The Dementia Foundations Program is a user-friendly and effective e-learning program, which can be conveniently scaled and spread to enhance unregulated care provider dementia education.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».