Intimacy and sexual well-being in couples coping with sexual interest/arousal disorder: the importance of perceived partner responsiveness
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder (SIAD) is one of the most common sexual issues reported by women and a leading reason for seeking sex and couple therapy-yet is rarely studied from a dyadic perspective. Intimacy is one interpersonal factor that could promote greater sexual well-being in individuals with SIAD and their partners. AIM: Using a dyadic cross-sectional design, this study examined the associations between the three components of intimacy (self-disclosure, perceived partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness) and sexual satisfaction, sexual distress and sexual function among 263 couples coping with SIAD. The moderating role of couple type (cisgender heterosexual vs sexual/gender diverse) was also assessed. METHOD: 263 individuals with SIAD (Mage = 34.16) and their partners (Mage = 35.71) completed validated questionnaires through the secure online survey platform Qualtrics. OUTCOMES: Outcomes were The Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction; The Sexual Distress Scale and the Sexual Function Evaluation Questionnaire. RESULTS: Results showed that when partners of individuals with SIAD perceived greater responsiveness from the individual with SIAD, it was associated with their own higher sexual satisfaction and sexual function, and lower sexual distress, as well as with the individual with SIAD's greater sexual satisfaction. Additionally, in sexual/gender-diverse relationships, individuals with SIAD who perceived greater partner responsiveness reported better sexual function. In cisgender heterosexual relationships, when partners perceived higher responsiveness from individuals with SIAD, this was also linked to the individual with SIAD's greater sexual function. However, self-disclosure and perceived partner disclosure were not associated with sexual well-being in the couple. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Enhancing feelings of closeness and connection through clinical interventions focusing on perceived partner responsiveness could help couples with SIAD better cope with the sexual challenges of SIAD. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study include the large and diverse clinical sample of couples coping with SIAD, the dyadic design, and the use of moderation to examine the role of couple type in the associations between intimacy and sexual well-being. However, the cross-sectional design limits our ability to establish causation, and the interpretation of results should consider the reliance on self-report questionnaires. CONCLUSION: Findings underscore the importance of understanding interpersonal dynamics in SIAD, highlighting the potential positive impact of perceived partner responsiveness on sexual well-being for individual with SIAD and their partners. The moderating effects of couple type on the individuals with SIAD's sexual function also underline the importance of including a diverse sample of couples in research on sexual dysfunction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».