MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4410857589 · doi:10.1097/txd.0000000000001815

Using Organs from Hepatitis C–Infected Donors: A Cautionary Experience

2025· letter· en· W4410857589 sur OpenAlexaff
Ella Shanahan, Eric M. Yoshida, Stéphanie Chartier-Plante, Trana Hussaini

Notice bibliographique

RevueTransplantation Direct · 2025
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHepatitis C virus research
Établissements canadiensVancouver General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHepatitis CVirologyHepatitis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized the landscape of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, offering cure rates of >95% with 8–12 wk of treatment. The World Health Organization is now advocating for HCV elimination by 2030, hence the increased treatment rates, especially in at-risk populations such as people who inject drugs.1 Before the availability of DAAs, hepatitis C viremic liver donors were considered unsuitable for transplantation because of the risk of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis and graft loss. In the post-DAA era, several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using HCV viremic donors as a viable option to expand the donor pool.2 Multiple groups have demonstrated successful achievement of sustained virologic response after transplanting HCV viremic grafts into HCV antibody negative recipients.3 Several leading groups including the American Society for Transplantation, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Journal of Kidney diseases have protocols in place regarding the use of these organs. In line with these current guidelines, hepatitis C viremic donors have now been considered transplantable in British Columbia. According to our local guidelines, all HCV viremic donors undergo genotyping and DAA resistance testing, although results are typically available 1–2 wk posttransplantation. Recently, a 25-y-old donor with hepatitis C (genotype 1A), reportedly antiviral treatment naïve, was assessed for organ donation (liver only). The organ was accepted but ultimately the liver was deemed unsuitable because of excessive steatosis. The intended recipient was hepatitis C negative. It was later reported that this potential donor had a pan resistant strain of the virus (Table 1), and that our available antivirals would not have been effective in curing this strain of hepatitis C. Although the donor had never received antiviral treatment, they had a history of active drug use and clearly acquired HCV from an antiviral resistant community source. TABLE 1. - Resistance testing for donor strain of hepatitis C HCV NS3 drugs Asunaprevir Resistance possible Glecaprevir Resistance possible Grazoprevir Resistance likely Paritaprevir Resistance likely Simeprevir Resistance likely Voxilaprevir Resistance possible HCV NS3 key resistance mutations identified: Q80K P334S HCV NS5A drugs Daclatasvir Resistance likely Elbasvir Resistance likely Ledipasvir Resistance likely Ombitasvir Resistance likely Pibrentasvir Resistance possible Velpatasvir Resistance possible HCV NS5A key resistance mutations identified: Q30R HCV NS5B drugs Dasabuvir Mutations detected: effect unknown Sofosbuvir Resistance possible HCV NS5B key resistance mutations identified: S62N N444D HCV, hepatitis C virus. We present this case as a word of caution for using organs from hepatitis C viremic donors. Once effective resistance testing is available in a timely manner, this may be a safe practice. With the current opioid crisis across North America, there is a risk that the circulating strain of HCV is becoming increasingly resistant even in treatment-naive individuals. The prevalence of resistance is currently unknown, although a recent meta-analysis suggests that among patients with virological failure following therapy (<5% of all patients treated), approximately 80% have resistance associated substitutions present.4 A recent report demonstrated that the presence of resistance associated substitutions increases after DAA exposure.5 We can infer that as more patients are treated and reinfected with hepatitis C, resistance can be expected to increase. If these organs are transplanted, patient outcomes could be dire because of untreatable hepatitis C infection. We suggest that the transplant centers consult their local center for disease control to identify local patterns of hepatitis C resistance before continuing to utilize viremic hepatitis C donors. We additionally suggest that where possible, donor history of prior exposure to or treatment for hepatitis C be obtained before transplantation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,354
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,343
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTransplantation DirectMême sujetHepatitis C virus researchTravaux en français237 207