ASPIRIN FOR PRE-ECLAMPSIA PREVENTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF DOSE AND TIMING EFFECTIVENESS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy affecting approximately 4% of pregnancies, contributing significantly to maternal and perinatal morbidity . Low-dose aspirin is widely recommended for preeclampsia prevention in high-risk pregnancies, but the optimal dose and timing of initiation remain under debate. This review evaluates different aspirin dosages (e.g., 75–81 mg vs 100–150 mg) and timing (initiation before vs after 16 weeks' gestation) for prevention of preeclampsia. Methods: We performed a systematic review of clinical studies following PRISMA guidelines.A comprehensive search of PubMed,Embase,and Cochrane Library (through April 2025) identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies examining aspirin prophylaxis in pregnancy and reporting preeclampsia outcomes. Data on study characteristics, aspirin dose, gestational age at initiation, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and Newcastle–Ottawa scale for observational studies. Outcomes of interest included incidence of preeclampsia (overall, preterm <37 weeks, and severe), as well as maternal and fetal outcomes. Results: A total of 38 studies (33 RCTs and 5 observational; >40,000 pregnancies) met inclusion criteria. Low-dose aspirin significantly reduced the risk of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women compared to placebo . Aspirin initiated before 16 weeks' gestation was associated with greater efficacy than later initiation,with a relative risk reduction up to ~50% when started early .Higher aspirin dosages (≈100–150 mg daily) conferred greater reduction in preeclampsia, especially preterm preeclampsia, compared to traditional 75–81 mg doses . For example, in women at high risk, aspirin 150 mg nightly from the first trimester reduced preterm preeclampsia by ~62% ,whereas trials using 60–81 mg showed only modest (10–20%) risk reductions or no significant benefit .No significant increase in maternal bleeding complications was observed with lowdose aspirin use ,even at the higher doses (e.g.150 mg) .Tables 1 and 2 summarize key RCT and observational findings. Conclusions: Prophylactic low-dose aspirin is an effective strategy to prevent preeclampsia,particularly when given at adequate doses (≥100 mg daily) and started before 16 weeks' gestation in women at elevated risk.Early aspirin initiation was consistently associated with reductions in preterm and severe preeclampsia.Both 75–81 mg and 150 mg regimens appear safe in pregnancy, with emerging evidence favoring the higher dose for maximal efficacy. Clinicians should initiate low-dose aspirin by the late first trimester in high-risk pregnancies,with dose selection individualized based on patient risk factors and regional guidelines. Further large RCTs comparing aspirin dosages are needed, but current evidence supports integrating early low-dose aspirin (often 150 mg) into prenatal care to reduce the burden of preeclampsia.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».