The Role of Alexithymia, Borderline Personality Traits and Resilience in Suicidal and Nonsuicidal Self‐Harm Behaviours Among Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Depression is a significant health issue among adolescents, often associated with decreased academic performance, self-harm and increased suicide attempts. Suicidal and self-harm behaviours are particularly concerning and are influenced by multiple factors beyond depression. This study aims to examine the factors contributing to suicidal behaviour and nonsuicidal self-harm in adolescents diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included adolescent patients aged 12-18 years diagnosed with MDD according to DSM-5 criteria, referred to our Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinic between 1 February 2023 and 1 August 2023. Participants with intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders were excluded. Data collection tools included the Sociodemographic Data Form, Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury, Child Depression Inventory, Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI), Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Child and Youth Resilience Measure-12 (CYRM-12). Data were analysed using SPSS25.0. RESULTS: Out of the 185 participants initially screened, 153 completed the study and were evenly divided into three groups: those who had never engaged in self-harm or attempted suicide (n = 51), those who had engaged in self-harm at least once but had not attempted suicide (n = 51) and those who had both engaged in self-harm and attempted suicide (n = 51). There were no significant differences in sociodemographic variables among the groups. Cutting was identified as the most common method of self-harm (84.3%), followed by scratching (72.5%). In terms of resilience, measured by the CYRM-12, the group with no history of self-harm or suicide attempts had significantly higher scores (M = 36.55) than the self-harm only group (M = 32.83) and the self-harm plus suicide attempt group (M = 31.03) (p < 0.001). For the BPI, the highest scores were observed in the group that had both engaged in self-harm and attempted suicide (M = 29.28), followed by the self-harm only group (M = 24.91) and the no self-harm or suicide group (M = 19.26) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adolescents with MDD who exhibit suicidal or self-harm behaviours have higher borderline personality traits and alexithymia levels, and lower resilience compared to their counterparts without such behaviours. These findings suggest the importance of early identification and intervention targeting these factors to mitigate the risk of self-harm and suicidal behaviour in depressed adolescents.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».