Home-Based Virtual Reality Training for Enhanced Balance, Strength, and Mobility Among Older Adults With Frailty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Frailty is a geriatric syndrome associated with increased risk of falls, hospitalization, and reduced quality of life. Traditional exercises may be unsuitable for older adults with frailty due to mobility issues and accessibility barriers. Virtual reality (VR) offers an engaging, home-based alternative by providing interactive training with real-time feedback. VR interventions have shown potential benefits for improving balance, strength, and mobility. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of VR-based home training programs in improving balance, strength, and mobility among older adults with frailty and prefrailty. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to November 1, 2023, using terms related to older adults, frailty, virtual reality, balance, mobility, and strength. Eligible studies included randomized and nonrandomized trials involving adults with frailty or prefrailty aged ≥65 years who received home-based VR interventions aimed at improving balance, strength, or functional mobility. Comparator groups included no intervention, traditional exercise, or standard care. Studies involving participants with neurological or cognitive disorders were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled mean differences (MD) and 95% CIs for 3 primary outcomes: Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go, and Chair Stand. Results: A total of 1063 records were identified, with 1023 screened after duplicate removal. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 407 participants (mean age 75.2, SD 6.4 y), of whom 198 were allocated to VR interventions and 159 to control groups. VR interventions lasted a mean of 13.3 (SD 7.7) weeks, with an average of 39.6 (SD 5.2) sessions lasting 25.3 (SD 5) minutes. Methodological quality was high in 5 studies (mean Physiotherapy Evidence Database score=5.6, SD 1.3). Four studies were included in the meta-analysis. Significant improvements were observed in balance, as measured by the Berg Balance Scale (MD=3.62; 95% CI 2.29-4.95; P<.001; I²=0%). No significant effects were found for mobility (Timed Up and Go: MD=-0.37; 95% CI -1.16 to 0.41; P=.35; I²=0%) or strength (Chair Stand: MD=-0.20; 95% CI -1.70 to 1.29; P=.79; I²=21%). Conclusions: VR-based home exercise interventions show promise in improving balance among older adults with frailty and prefrailty. However, their effects on strength and functional mobility remain unclear. Variability in study designs and outcome measures limits the generalizability of current findings. Further high-quality research is needed to determine optimal VR training protocols and assess long-term adherence and clinical effectiveness.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,016 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».