Optimal Head-of-Bed Positioning Before Thrombectomy in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Small studies show that 0° head positioning of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke improves penumbral blood flow and clinical stability. Understanding whether 0° head position maintains clinical stability would allow for optimal patient positioning before thrombectomy. Objective: To determine superiority of 0° over 30° head positioning at maintaining clinical stability in patients with LVO before thrombectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective randomized clinical trial with blinding to study enrollment/end points conducted from May 2018 to November 2023. There were 3 planned interim analyses, and the study was conducted at certified thrombectomy hospitals in the US. Included in this analysis were consecutive consenting individuals with computed tomography (CT) angiography-positive anterior or posterior LVO who were candidates for thrombectomy (baseline mRS 0-1) and had viable penumbra (CT perfusion or Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score ≥6) within 24 hours of stroke onset. Enrollment of systemic thrombolysis more than 15 minutes from consent was discouraged to prevent confounding of head position effects; in addition, patients with disabilities who lacked a legal representative could not participate due to lack of consent. Interventions: Randomization to 0° or 30° head positioning with monitoring every 10 minutes using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) until movement to a catheterization table. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was worsening of 2 or more NIHSS points before thrombectomy. Safety outcomes included severe neurologic deterioration (worsening ≥4 NIHSS points) before thrombectomy, hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) during hospitalization, and all-cause death within 3 months. Results: Planned enrollment included 182 patients. Before data and safety monitoring board study closure, a total of 92 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.6 [14.4] years; 48 male [52.2%]) were randomized: 45 patients to the group with 0° head positioning and 47 patients to the group with 30° head positioning. Patient characteristics were similar between groups; however, patients with head position at 30° experienced worsening on the NIHSS of 2 points or more, whereas patients with head position at 0° showed score stability (hazard ratio [HR], 34.40; 95% CI, 4.65-254.37; P < .001). One patient with 0° head positioning and 20 patients with 30° head positioning experienced worsening on the NIHSS of 4 points or more during positioning (HR, 23.57; 95% CI, 3.16-175.99; P = .002). No patients developed HAP; all-cause death occurred in 2 patients (4.4%) in the 0° group, compared with 10 patients (21.7%; P = .03) in the 30° group. Conclusions and Relevance: Results suggest that 0° head positioning for patients with acute LVO was a protective maneuver to maintain clinical stability in the prethrombectomy phase while awaiting definitive treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03728738.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».