Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Most guidelines recommend chemotherapy as opposed to primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pRPLND) for clinical stage (CS) II testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) with elevated serum tumor markers (STMs) because of the risk of systemic disease.Contrary to this, we have offered primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pRPLND) to select patients with CS II disease with elevated STMs, believing a substantial portion can be cured with surgery alone.Methods: A retrospective analysis using data from our prospectively maintained eCancerCare Testis database was performed.Patients who underwent primary robotic and open pRPLND between 1983 and 2022 were included.The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS).Secondary endpoints were location of relapse, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and perioperative outcomes, including operative time, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical complications.RFS and CSS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method, and log-rank test was used to assess the impact of marker-positive vs. marker-negative status at the time of surgery.Results: We identified 208 patients who underwent pRPLND at our institution, 173 (83.2%) open and 35 (16.8%) robotic, with median followup of 4.7 years.All patients had non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT); 46.1% were diagnosed with CS I disease with relapse as CS II and 53.9% with initial CS II.A total of 66 (31.7%) patients had elevated STMs.STM elevation was associated with a higher risk of relapse; RFS at five years was 93% (95% CI 86.5-96.5) vs. 75.9%(95% CI 62.6-85) in patients with negative vs. positive STMs (p=0.0004).CSS at five years was 100% vs. 96.1% (95% CI 85.3-99) in patients with negative vs. positive STMs (p=0.0044).Of the five cancer-specific deaths observed, two were associated with somatic transformation, two were in patients who were advised to receive upfront chemotherapy but were non-compliant, and one due to febrile illness during salvage chemotherapy.Elevation in one and/or both STMs was associated with increased relapse risk, whereas only the degree of AFP elevation was associated with worse CSS.There were no differences observed in surgical complications.Conclusions: This is the largest, single-center study of patients with marker-positive testicular cancer undergoing pRPLND.Although elevated STMs are associated with an increased risk of relapse and cancer-specific mortality when compared with patients with negative STMs, pRPLND can be curative in up to 74% of patients, and the majority of those who relapse can be effectively salvaged if compliant with care.pRPLND in patients with marker-positive status should be discussed with patients in a multidisciplinary fashion, balancing the increased risk of relapse and morbidity of salvage chemotherapy against the long-term effects of primary chemotherapy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,569 | 0,305 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».