Regional Prevalence, Stage Distribution, and Temporal Trends of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome in the Americas, Europe and Western Pacific: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background The cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome, first proposed by the American Heart Association (AHA) in 2023, represents a groundbreaking conceptual framework that integrates these three interrelated conditions into a unified clinical entity. Despite growing research on its prevalence, risk factors, and clinical management, the regional burden of CKM syndrome remains poorly characterized. To address this gap, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of CKM syndrome, providing critical insights into the regional impact of this novel disease definition. Methods In this study, we conducted literature retrieval in both English (PubMed, Web of Science and Wiley Online Library) and Chinese databases (CNKI and Wangfang), as well as the journal official websites (e.g. American Heart Association (AHA) and American Society of Nephrology (ASN)) from database inception until January 20, 2025, followed by an update search until April 1, 2025. Grey literature such as posters and preprint articles, and citations from the identified reviews were also searched for. Cross sectional and cohort studies were included without language limitation. Studies employing other study designs or were done in people who were not representative of the general population (e.g. people with specific diseases) were excluded. Summary data were obtained from included studies. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of CKM syndrome and its different stages (stages 0 - 4) among general population. The combined prevalence was obtained with Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation method. The estimated annuls percentage change (EAPC) was employed to explore the trend of CKM syndrome. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251037912). Findings From 2,708 identified 2,708 related articles, 28 studies with 29 datapoints, encompassing 1,561,209 individuals, were included. The overall pooled prevalence of CKM syndrome (Stages 1–4) in the general population was 0.88 [95% CI 0.86–0.91]. This estimate was 0.85 [95% CI 0.76–0.91] in a sensitivity analysis selecting one representative study per database to test the magnitude of potential duplicate bias. The combined prevalence of stages 1, 2, 3 and 4 was 0.23 [95% CI 0.19–0.27], 0.46 [95% CI 0.41–0.51], 0.08 [95% CI 0.05–0.11], 0.07 [95% CI 0.04–0.12], respectively, displaying as the Stage 2 patients were the majority of CKM syndrome. The EAPC of CKM syndrome in the period of 1991-2021 was (-0.55% [95% CI -0.90 to 0.21], p=0.0024), displaying a significant decreased trend. Stratified by countries, the pooled estimates were 0.91 [95% CI 0.90–0.93] for USA, 0.90 [95% CI 0.87–0.93] for China, and 0.77 [95% CI 0.69–0.84] for other countries (UK, Italy and South Korea). CKM syndrome prevalence demonstrated an increasing trend with a higher proportion of males (male/female ratio <0.98) and with increasing mean age (up to 56.5 years). Statistically significant disparities were observed across social development index (SDI) level, data source and countries. Interpretation This study provides the pooled regional prevalence of CKM syndrome in the general population; these findings are valuable for understanding the current burden of CKM syndrome and facilitating more research into the clinical management and prevention. While a slight decreasing temporal trend was observed based on the included studies, the relatively high combined prevalence suggests more epidemiological research into missing regions, such as Africa and South America, to verify this finding. Research In Context Evidence before this study Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) syndrome has drawn substantial attention to the complex interactions among cardiovascular, kidney and metabolic diseases. Previous studies reported a heavy burden of CKM syndrome in certain jurisdictions, for example, the weighted prevalence was 83.7% in China in 2019 and 79.5% in the USA in 2023 nationwide. However, the epidemiological studies reporting the burden of CKM syndrome regionally remain inadequate. Thus, we did a meta-analysis to map the prevalence of CKM syndrome globally. We searched PubMed from database inception to April 1, 2025, using terms (with variants) like “meta-analysis”, “CKM syndrome” and “prevalence”, and did not find any other meta-analysis reporting this topic. Added value of this study This study provides a comprehensive regional view of the prevalence of CKM syndrome in the general population, with additional temporal trend analysis based on study period, male/female ratio and average age. Our analysis indicated a significant but slight downward trend of the prevalence of CKM syndrome from 1991 to 2021. The pooled prevalence of CKM syndrome was between 0.85 [95% CI 0.76–0.91] and 0.88 [95% CI 0.86–0.91], with stage 2 patients taking the highest proportion. Significant differences were observed across sociodemographic index (SDI), data source and countries. Middle level SDI, population-based design and USA showed the highest prevalence of CKM syndrome compared to their counterparts. Implications of all the available evidence This study provides up-to-date estimates of regional burden of CKM syndrome and can be referred to future public health promotion planning, as well as to explore the risk factors and locate the high-risk population. The relatively high pooled prevalence of CKM syndrome, nearly close to 90%, highlights the urgent need for developing risk stratification and prevention strategies for CKM syndrome patients, especially preventing staging progress among substantial stage 2 patients. The significant disparities in the prevalence of CKM syndrome across SDI, data source of the study and countries necessitating targeted strategies and further study design of this topic. Both developed and developing countries are facing heavy burden of CKM syndrome, where public health policies to reduce risk factors of CKM syndrome might be effective in alleviating the burden. Although the reported prevalence of CKM syndrome has declined from 1991 to 2021, this trend may be influenced by publication bias, as key regions with potentially higher CKM syndrome risks, such as Africa and South America, lack sufficient prevalence data. Therefore, more studies need to be conducted in these regions for more accurate estimate of global prevalence. Besides, more population-specific prevalence (such as sex, age group, different groups of patients) are also needed to help with risk factors determination.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,014 | 0,030 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».