MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411107314 · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1619110

Editorial: Voices from the frontline: the lived experiences of healthcare professionals in the workplace

2025· editorial· en· W4411107314 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Berghs

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Sociology · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth professionalsHealth careLived experiencePublic relationsSociologyEngineering ethicsPolitical scienceNursingMedicinePsychologyEngineeringLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Genova and Lombardi's commentary picks up on the idea of public health investments in General Practitioners (GPs) or family doctors as cornerstone of primary care. They examine data from 21 European countries looking at if the number of GPs per 100,000 inhabitants increased or decreased between 1995 to 2014. Most European healthcare systems increased the number of GPs coherently with WHO recommendations. They suggest that a country like Italy, which has not invested in family doctors and thus in the primary care sector in last two decades, would have been less equipped to manage pandemics.The COVID-19 pandemic also illustrated the importance of personal care attendants for older adults and persons with disabilities, especially if primary care is no longer accessible. Wendel et al. described how critical personal care attendants were but how their services are not always given recognition. They found personal care attendants do not have equitable pay or professional recognition but they do see themselves as having intrinsic rewards in their work and social support. Yet, a lack of professionalism and investment will compromise future care and quality. Care services are increasingly moving from the clinic to the home. Ensuring greater professionalism of this caring workforce will become a necessity and while not explicit in their work, they point to new forms of discriminations, such as ableism and ageism in healthcare (Simmonds & Berghs, 2024), in careism, a discrimination which views embodied and other forms of care-giving as less important and as less entitled to professional status.While training, recognition and renumeration are important, so are the conditions in which healthcare professionals work. Xiao et al.'s cross-sectional study investigated the impact of workplace violence against healthcare workers in China, finding that 58.2% of healthcare professionals reported experiencing at least one experience of workplace violence in the past year with emotional abuse being the most commonly reported. Alnaeem et al. also examined workplace violence against nurses in Jordan. They found that 59.6% of the nurses reported verbal abuse was common in their workplace. Both illustrate hierarchies in professions, gendered discriminations but that violence is becoming more commonplace globally.To understand more about the abuse and racism that health care professionals experience, Ahlberg et al. found that ethnic minority staff have to engage in emotional labour. To be a professional means to deal with dilemmas such as discussing racism but also to ethically treat racist patients. They explain how staff had strategies to manage such dilemmas but this had a physical and emotional (traumatic) toll on the health and wellbeing of healthcare professionals. Ahlberg et al. note how a politics of fear now intersects with professional experiences of hostile environment to immigrants or people who they perceive as 'other' countering ideas of necessity of global and diverse workforce.Minorities and their experiences were also the focus of Bizzeth and Beagan's qualitative study in Canada. They explored heath care professionals' experiences with work-related microaggressions and heteronormativity. They coin the innovative idea of 'heteroprofessionalism' and argue that the concept of professional carries encoded within it demands that the occupant of that category be-or present as-heterosexual, an unmarked status that can be readily desexualized. They point to a need to rethink what the boundaries are of professional and ethical behaviours in practice in keeping with new forms of identities and discriminations experienced.McNeill et al.'s study also examined professional boundaries in risks of burnout among surgeons in Canada. They found a complex picture of inequitable remuneration associated with education, administration, and leadership roles correlated to the Fee-For-Service model, as well as issues of gender inequity and the individualistic culture that develops as surgeons specialise. They noted how surgeons often had answers for these problems. They suggested to reform payment plans, hospital policies and ensure more social and practical support to combat loneliness and inequalities.More research is now also concentrating on how to strengthen mental health and resilience through interventions. Alotaibi's study investigated the impact of perceived behavioural control, attitudes, subjective norms, and emotion-focused coping on willingness to treat viral-infected patients in Saudi Arabia. They argue for interventions such as training programs focused on infection control measures and patient management strategies, so healthcare professionals can feel more emotionally and practically prepared in future pandemics. Carminati's article too focuses on the role of emotions at work for healthcare professionals and how emotional management is part of the job but does not always lead to emotional intelligence. They argue that the integration of emotional management and emotional intelligence could bridge the gap between these two pivotal abilities and foster better behavioural and mental health.All of the contributors point to the needs to invest in rethinking healthcare professionalism with new competencies, such as emotional and physical management, training and resiliencies, training against risks, violence and newer forms of discriminations and racisms we are discovering in employment settings. This will demand local and global investments in healthcare systems as well as creation of new jobs and roles to ensure its sustainability.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,170
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,422
Écart entre enseignants0,394 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in SociologyMême sujetHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutTravaux en français237 207