Services Delivered by Specialized Professionals in Childcare Settings in Québec, Canada: Strengths and Limitations of Current Service Delivery Models
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Specialized professionals, including healthcare professionals and early childhood special educators (ECSEs), wish to offer more in-context interventions in childcare settings. Limited information is available about how these services are and should be organized. The aim of this study was to describe the different service delivery models currently used in a context of publicly funded healthcare and childcare systems (Québec, Canada) and to identify the strengths and limitations of these models. METHODS: An interpretative descriptive research approach was used. Qualitative data from an online survey (n = 344) and semi-structured interviews (n = 18) were used. Questions focused on the description of services (e.g., type of specialized professionals involved, children served, funding) and strengths and limitations of those services. Data were coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Data were classified into 10 service delivery models and are presented using a four-quadrant paradigm based on the source of funding (either internal [childcare-led] or external to childcare) and the focus of service (either child-centred or childcare-centred). Services funded by childcare providers (Quadrants 1 and 3) offered flexibility in addressing priority needs identified by childcare providers and facilitated collaboration with early childhood educators. Childcare-centred models (Quadrants 3 and 4) addressed the needs of children not receiving individual healthcare services. Healthcare-funded services (Quadrants 2 and 4) provided free services for childcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: Each service delivery model had its own strengths and limitations. To enhance support for childcare providers and the children they serve, stakeholders should consider using a variety of service delivery models covering all four quadrants. Three key actions should be considered to improve current services: (1) incorporate more childcare-centred services to reduce the number of underserved children; (2) offer more childcare-led services to align with priority needs identified by childcare providers; and (3) improve intersectoral collaboration by developing cross-institutional policies. KEY MESSAGES: A variety of service delivery models is needed to enhance support for childcare providers and the children they serve. Childcare-centred service delivery models could serve a greater number of children, particularly those underserved by child-centred service delivery models. Childcare-led service delivery models are needed to align services with the needs and priorities identified by childcare providers. Healthcare and childcare systems would benefit from formalized cross-institutional policies to facilitate intersectoral collaboration.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».