MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411141181 · doi:10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2024-192

Re-employment medical examinations: assessing fitness to work in ageing healthcare workers

2025· article· en· W4411141181 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mei Ling Tan, Elliot Eu, John Wah Lim, Shiu Hong Wong

Notice bibliographique

RevueSingapore Medical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueWorkplace Health and Well-being
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAgeingHealth careWork (physics)Gerontology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Singapore is experiencing significant demographic shifts due to its rapidly ageing population. This presents challenges such as staffing shortages across many industries.[1] Extending the working lives of older workers is a potential solution. However, ageing increases susceptibility to medical conditions that may affect fitness to work (FTW). In the employed ageing worker, FTW assessment may be conducted as a requisite for re-employment. An effective re-employment medical examination (RME) ensures appropriate match of functional capacity to job demands, while also providing opportunities for bespoke work accommodations and, if needed, job role redesign.[2-4] Additional benefits of an RME include preventative screening and health promotion.[1] Re-employment medical screening programmes (RMSPs) should be periodically evaluated for efficiency and effectiveness. Key considerations include functional components screened, screening tools and overall financial sustainability. This paper details pertinent considerations in the review and introduction of changes to an existing RMSP. Components that do not significantly contribute towards FTW assessment were removed, and enhancements were made to allow for the timely detection of health conditions that may functionally impact the worker. We have focused on the healthcare sector, which has traditionally faced manpower constraints and where job demands are high. Our review framework may serve as a reference for other industries looking to introduce RMSP. Singapore Health Services (SingHealth) is a healthcare cluster comprising a network of acute and community hospitals, national speciality centres and polyclinics. The total staff strength was 32,829 as of 31 March 2023. Recent legislative changes have increased the statutory retirement age to 63 years and the re-employment age to 68 years.[5] Eligible staff who attain the minimum retirement age are offered re-employment, contingent upon undergoing an RME. Re-employment medical examination starts at age 63 years and is repeated at age 66 years and 68 years, and then conducted annually thereafter. In the last two decades, over 10,000 RMEs have been conducted, and this number is expected to increase in view of the ageing workforce.We sought to review the existing RME to improve its efficiency and effectiveness. As the review was aimed at improving clinical efficiency and effectiveness, and did not involve personal data, institutional review board approval was not required. FRAMEWORK FOR RE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION Functional capacity assessment Physical function Vision and hearing: Age-related changes in vision and hearing can impact job performance, particularly in healthcare settings where attention to detail is crucial. Regular screening ensures that healthcare workers can effectively communicate and perform tasks safely. Cardiorespiratory: Physical demands, such as patient transfers and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, necessitate good cardiorespiratory health. As workers advance in age, their physical workloads should be adjusted accordingly and they should be encouraged to engage in regular exercise.[2] Musculoskeletal (dexterity/functional ability): Balance, gait, range of movement and overall motor coordination can decline with age and should be assessed to protect the worker from accidents and injuries. Preventive education on healthy work postures and guidance on muscle resistance exercises should be included during RME.[3] Dexterity may be particularly important in certain job roles (e.g. surgeon/procedurist), and further objective assessments may be necessary. Chronic disease: Early detection and management of chronic diseases reduces the likelihood of premature workforce exit. The RME serves as a platform to encourage workers to participate in the free basic health screenings offered by the cluster. Where relevant, vaccination counselling and administration serve to protect workers from biological hazards. Cognitive ability: Healthcare workers need to be sharp-minded to provide quality care. Cognitive assessments can identify potential issues and allow for appropriate interventions. Psychological capacity Ageing workers are not spared from the stressors of a fast-paced, dynamic and emotionally exhausting healthcare environment,[6] which may impact mental health.[7] Vulnerable groups include those with chronic medical conditions who fear the risk of contagion and those with pre-existing mental illnesses. Social capacity The RME can serve as a platform to identify social realms in which the worker requires support. Examples include interpersonal relationships with colleagues, support from supervisors and time-off for caregiving commitments or medical appointments. Job assessment To align job requirements with functional capacity, we collated information from the job descriptions, along with input from supervisors and workers. These include the type of tasks performed, pace of work, working hours and shift patterns, and hazards at the workplace. Where necessary, workplace visits were conducted to optimise workers’ health and safety. Workplace accommodations were recommended as needed, such as ergonomic equipment to protect the worker or job modifications such as restricted job tasks, improved work organisation for physical or cognitive breaks, shorter working hours and reduction in exposure to workplace hazards.[8] Protection from job-specific hazards Healthcare workers may be exposed to a variety of hazards such as alcohol hand rubs, which may irritate the skin. Screening for eczema, which predisposes the healthcare worker to contact dermatitis, allows opportunistic education on preventive strategies that the worker may adopt. SCREENING TOOLS The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Brief was chosen for mental capacity screening, as it has been reported to have high sensitivity and specificity for detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and is easy to administer.[9,10] It has also been used across various cultures and languages,[10] which is important in our setting where a substantial proportion of healthcare workers are foreigners. The Vulnerable Elders Survey may be used to screen for functional disability, with scores of 3 or more requiring further assessment via the Short Physical Performance Battery. Both tools are useful for identifying ageing adults at risk for functional decline, increased morbidity, mortality, institutionalisation and falls.[11,12] The Purdue Pegboard Test can be used for dexterity screening for workers in jobs that require gross and fine motor dexterity. Selective use of the test during RME can detect loss of function in ageing workers afflicted by basal ganglia diseases such as Parkinson’s disease.[13] SCREENING FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES Screening for blood-borne viruses (e.g. hepatitis B or hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus [HIV]) enhances patient safety and promotes occupational health. Screening occurs before entry into local healthcare courses and at pre-employment medical examinations. For those who were found to be non-immune to hepatitis B at those timepoints, vaccination and follow-up antibody testing are conducted to ensure protective levels. Carriers are not allowed to perform exposure-prone procedures. Routine testings for hepatitis C and HIV are not recommended under national guidelines.[14] Hence, recommendations were made for a one-time screen at re-employment, only if there had not been a previous screening. Screening for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) via chest X-rays is required at pre-employment. Foreign applicants found to have active TB will not be issued work permits. Risk of pulmonary TB transmission at the workplace is low, as staff are protected by comprehensive infection control measures. Staff with latent TB infection are strongly encouraged to undergo treatment. Therefore, it was decided that staff would undergo a one-time chest X-ray at the initial RME. Table 1 summarises the changes made to the RME programme based on our review, the rationale for the tests and the consequent cost savings.Table 1: Summary of the components of a re-employment medical screening (RME).DISCUSSION The Tripartite Workgroup on Older Workers was formed in 2018 to review matters relating to retirement and re-employment. The workgroup recommends that FTW should be based on the objective assessment of job requirements and relevant health or physical conditions rather than age.[15] The RME framework aligns to these recommendations by focusing on assessments of physical, mental, psychological and social capacity. Validated screening tools were recommended to enhance functional screening. Blood tests (only when necessary) and radiological investigations were conducted at a reduced frequency, considering the low risks and existing national and institutional safeguards. We included only assessments relevant to occupational demands. The necessity, frequency, and most appropriate tests were determined based on scientific evidence, as well as legal, ethical, and economic considerations. We also considered the costs, inconvenience of unnecessary screening, and the potential harm of false-positive results. For cognitive screening, we considered the prevalence of MCI and the impact of clinician MCI on the quality of practice and patient outcomes. In healthcare workers aged ≥70 years, 12.7% were found to have impaired cognition on screening before re-credentialing.[16] Among physicians, 22% of those ≥75 years had gross deficiencies in practice.[17] It has been reported that MCI in clinicians affect patient outcomes, with patients treated by older physician-hospitalists recording higher mortality rates.[18] Screening for MCI was deemed to be overall beneficial. However, mandatory cognitive screening should only be introduced when accompanied by safeguards to protect employee confidentiality and mechanisms to manage abnormal results. Additionally, there must be institutional commitment towards reasonable job accommodations. Making an adverse employment decision because of disability may also be seen as discriminatory.[19] Given these concerns, cognitive screening was introduced as a pilot for proof of concept for mandatory cognitive screening. It is currently conducted on a voluntary basis for healthcare workers aged ≥75 years. CONCLUSION Even the best RME programme has its limitations; therefore judicious exercise by attending physicians is still important. Although RME is conducted at a single time-point, it should not preclude FTW assessments when needed, such as when workers return after prolonged illness. In general, re-employed workers should be presumed medically fit to continue working.[15] Best efforts should be made to reintegrate workers into their original roles through modified work duties or job restrictions. Work accommodations, part-time scheduling or restricted duties in the same role should be explored first. If that is not possible, redesignation into a more suitable role may be an option, failing which retirement may be necessary. Finally, only medical information relevant to FTW and required for work accommodations should be shared with the worker’s consent. Acknowledgement We thank the SingHealth Senior Management and all contributing experts for their support in the review of the RME. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,454
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,453
Écart entre enseignants0,409 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSingapore Medical JournalMême sujetWorkplace Health and Well-beingTravaux en français237 207