MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411147747 · doi:10.5406/15351882.138.548.18

Paramisa òthe, Sastipe akate/Romani Legends and Fairy Tales

2025· article· en· W4411147747 sur OpenAlexaff
Enkelejda Sula-Raxhimi

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of American Folklore · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueRomani and Gypsy Studies
Établissements canadiensSaint Paul University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArtLiteratureHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Paramisa òthe, Sastipe akate/Romani Legends and Fairy Tales gathers a selection of five tales and Romani legends, presented in narrative and comic novel form. Selected and drawn by the Albanian Romani artist Sead Kazanxhiu, the book brings these tales to written form for the first time, not only in the Romani language, a mainly oral language and cultural tradition, but also translated into other languages—namely, Albanian, English, and French, making them accessible to a larger audience in Europe, where the majority of the Roma people live, but also globally. Sharing with the world even a small piece of Romani oral cultural traditions in written form is a huge step forward in acknowledging their existence while at the same time understanding, promoting, and celebrating the richness and beauty of such traditions. Hence, this publication contributes to recognizing the Romani language, folklore, and cultural traditions among other world traditions, rendering visible and creating a greater space for cultural traditions thought by many to exist only through oral transmission from one generation to another. It brings to the fore and opens the space toward democratization of knowledge, where the Roma—their folklore, their culture, and knowledge system—come to life in written form, among other well-known literary traditions.The author has done an excellent job by taking these Romani tales and legends in their original form and drawing and representing them as comic novels, while visualizing the dialogues mainly in the Romani language. Playing with the colors and contrasts of light and dark of softer and warmer colors in the stories told through short dialogues further strengthens the claiming and appropriation of this space to voice some of the stories that humanize the Roma people and challenge the stereotypes and prejudices that circulate about them throughout Europe.The first tale, “The Woman with Braids Who Saved the Village,” portrays both the negative consequences of such stereotypes on the Romani people—through the fact that nobody opens the door to allow them to spend the night indoors. At the same time, it also shows the breaking of such stereotypes and highlights the Roma contribution to the community—through annihilating the bad omen portrayed in the killing of the snake at the water mill, after which the village community accepts and welcomes the Roma.The second tale, “The Fourth Nail,” is set in Nazareth during biblical times. Although it serves to counter the false belief about the Roma putting Jesus Christ on the cross, one may also wonder about its religious connotation. The Roma people have lived for centuries in various regions throughout Europe and have often embraced the religion of the place. For instance, in the Balkans, most Roma identify as Muslims and believe mainly in Islam, while elsewhere this may not be the case. Therefore, the association with Christianity here may have more symbolic value in contesting negative stereotypes rather than hinting at their religious affiliation.The third tale, “Twelve Dresses and Twelve Nightgowns,” is a Roma folktale portraying the complexity and the many hidden layers of a human being as well as the challenges of grasping them all. It teaches a lesson in compassion and humanity, according to which one should not lose faith in humankind, as human beings are complex and come in different shapes and forms, wrapped and nourished by their cultural traditions, which may be unknown to many.The fourth tale, “The Donkey That Ate the Letters,” depicts the fate of the Romani alphabet, which took a long time and much effort to materialize. At the same time, it paints not only the sorrows and sufferings of the Romani people, but also their desires and efforts to have their language written and recognized so they could tell their stories and celebrate their cultural traditions in written form. The tale has lightness and humor while articulating the political project behind recognizing the Roma alphabet and language.The fifth tale, “The Beekeeper,” tells the story of a people who are hardworking and resourceful, even in challenging and enduring circumstances. Thus, the tale counters the stereotype that portrays the Roma as lazy people who do not like to work, perfectly rendering a lesson that challenges such prejudices without directly talking about them.This booklet is relevant to young and adult Roma and non-Roma people in Albania, the Balkans, and across Europe, to make the Roma language and culture accessible to all. Making it available in a format that is easy to read and understand also contributes to countering and fighting racial discrimination, negative stereotypes, and the anti-Gypsyism sentiment from which Roma people suffer throughout Europe and the Balkans. At the same time, the booklet is an important contribution to the field of folklore studies, to teaching, and to research, as the tales—in a written and a comic novel form—are part of Romani cultural oral tradition. I commend the Roma author and artist for his engagement, activism, and immense contribution to the Roma communities at large.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,085
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,515

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,401
Écart entre enseignants0,379 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of American FolkloreMême sujetRomani and Gypsy StudiesTravaux en français237 207