Addressing the Socioemotional Dimension of Medical Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Student-Driven Development Strategies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The current international context, marked by complex global challenges, necessitates the rapid intervention of higher education institutions to contribute to social transformation. Medical education, in particular, is undergoing significant changes influenced by various factors, including the evolving health care environment and shifting social expectations. Socioemotional skills are increasingly recognized as essential competencies for medical professionals, contributing to better patient care, improved communication, and enhanced teamwork. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature on strategies employed by medical students to develop and promote their socioemotional skills in academic and hospital settings. METHODS: The review will be conducted according to the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the results will be presented in accordance with PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). Eligibility criteria include studies focusing on medical students at any stage of their education, addressing strategies for developing socioemotional skills in academic or clinical contexts. Information sources include Embase, Emerald, PsycNet, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, with searches conducted from January 2000 to April 2025. Gray literature sources, including ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Conference Proceedings Citation Index, and OpenGrey, will also be searched. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data will be extracted using a standardized form and synthesized through narrative synthesis and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Results from our initial searches indicate a diverse range of literature addressing student-driven strategies for socioemotional skill development in medical education. The scoping review is progressing according to the following timeline. Protocol development and registration was completed in January 2025. Search strategy refinement was completed in February 2025. The initial database searching was expected to be completed in March or April 2025. Title and abstract screening are anticipated to be performed in May or June 2025. Full-text review and data extraction are anticipated to be performed in July to August 2025. Data synthesis and analysis are anticipated to be completed by September or October 2025. The manuscript is expected to be prepared and submitted by November or December 2025. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review may have significant implications for medical education curricula, informing the integration of socioemotional skill development alongside traditional medical knowledge and technical skills. Furthermore, the review may uncover gaps in the existing literature, highlighting areas that require further research and investigation. This scoping review will contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the importance of socioemotional skills in medical education. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/66757.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,142 | 0,136 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,014 | 0,016 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,016 | 0,015 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,010 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,081 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».