MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411178768 · doi:10.2147/jhl.s517669

Examining Canadian Hospitals’ Support for Planetary Health Through the Implementation of Green Teams and Sustainability Offices

2025· article· en· W4411178768 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Maya R. Kalogirou, Jennifer Baumbusch

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Healthcare Leadership · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueClimate Change and Health Impacts
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSustainabilityBusinessEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningGeographyEnvironmental science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Purpose: Planetary health is the idea that human health and the health of our planet are inextricably linked. The healthcare sector promotes human health but has a significant impact on our natural world. In Canada, some hospitals are leading the way towards promoting planetary health in an increasingly challenging context. The purpose of this study was to understand how Canadian hospitals support planetary health, specifically through green teams and sustainability offices. Patients and Methods: People working in Canadian hospitals, either in sustainability offices or green teams, were invited to participate in this study. Participants completed an online survey and indicated if they would like to take part in a semi-structured interview via Zoom. Twenty-nine participants were interviewed and asked about how they supported planetary health and how their teams were integrated into the hospital setting. Interview transcripts were analyzed and data were summarized using thematic analysis. Demographic information was collected through the survey. Results: Three main themes were: 1) From grassroots to corporate: Green teams and sustainability offices. This theme defined, compared, and contrasted teams and offices; 2) Operationalizing this work: Five green team exemplars. The five teams were: 1) the single-person green team; 2) the health profession-specific green team; 3) the green team pilot project; 4) external partners supporting green teams; and 5) the “bottom up” meets “top down” green team; and 3) Paving the path forward and tracking success. This theme explored how teams used metrics and other broader indicators to understand success. Conclusion: This study examined the work of Canadian sustainability offices and green teams in the hospital setting. The former promoted planetary health from a “top-down” perspective while the latter did so from a “bottom-up” perspective. Teams that integrated both approaches were the most effective in promoting planetary health. Plain Language Summary: The health sector is harming the planet’s natural systems, and now there is a need for it to start promoting planetary health. Planetary health is the idea that human health and the health of our natural systems are inseparable, and promoting planetary health means delivering health services in a way that also reduces climate change, pollution, and biosphere integrity issues. Hospitals have responded by creating sustainability offices. Hospital employees have responded by striking up green teams. The work these offices and teams are doing are well-documented in some healthcare systems, but in Canada, not much is known. This study was done so that we could better understand how Canadian hospitals support planetary health, specifically through green teams and sustainability offices. We sent out surveys that collected preliminary information on participants; anyone working in a sustainability office or on a green team in a Canadian hospital. We then conducted interviews, and from those data, we identified three themes:From grassroots to corporate: Green teams and sustainability officesOperationalizing this work: Five green team exemplarsPaving the path forward and tracking success Overall, there are good reasons for Canadian hospitals to have both a sustainability office and a green team as they focus on slightly different planetary health initiatives. It is also a strength to have a “top-down” meets “bottom-up” approach to planetary health promotion, because when sustainability offices work together with green teams, or when leaders themselves are part of teams, they can target larger-scale, more impactful planetary health initiatives. Keywords: planetary health, hospitals, climate change, environmental sustainability, net zero

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,854
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,990

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,026
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0210,007
Communication savante0,0080,003
Science ouverte0,0030,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,118
Tête enseignante GPT0,383
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Healthcare LeadershipMême sujetClimate Change and Health ImpactsTravaux en français237 207