Optimizing and Testing an Individualized and Adaptive Physical Activity Digital Health Intervention: Protocol for a Control Optimization Trial Embedded Within a Randomized Controlled Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: While effective physical activity (PA) interventions exist, interventions often work only for some individuals or only for a limited time. Thus, there is a need for digital health interventions that account for dynamic, idiosyncratic PA determinants to support each person's PA. We hypothesize that supporting individuals with their personal PA goals requires a personalized intervention that both supports each person in forming daily habits of walking more and develops personalized knowledge, skills, and practices regarding engaging in exercise routines. We operationalized these adaptive features via a digital health intervention called YourMove that uses a control systems approach to support personalized habit formation and a self-experimentation approach to develop personalized knowledge, skills, and practices. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim is to evaluate differences in minutes of moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) per week at 12 months comparing our personalized intervention, called YourMove, with an active control that is similar but without personalization of the intervention components and mimics best-in-class digital health worksite wellness programs. METHODS: The YourMove study is a 12-month randomized controlled trial that involves 386 inactive adults aged 25 to 80 years. All participants receive (1) a Fitbit Versa smartwatch and corresponding smartphone app; (2) weekly PA goal suggestions and feedback, behavior change strategies, and reminders via SMS text messaging; and (3) up to US $50 in incentives for reaching daily step goals. Participants randomized to the active control group, modeled after worksite wellness programs, receive all the elements described in addition to a static daily step goal and static point rewards. Participants randomized to the intervention group receive (1) a habit formation element with daily personalized step goals and personalized point rewards generated through a control optimization trial approach and (2) a knowledge, skill, and practice development element featuring a self-guided self-experimentation tool that helps individuals find strategies to improve MVPA. The primary outcome is objectively assessed weekly minutes of MVPA via an ActiGraph monitor. RESULTS: Recruitment began in October 2022 and concluded in August 2024. Data collection will conclude in August 2025, with results expected by early 2026. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesize that the intervention group will show greater improvement in MVPA than the active control group at 12 months. If the hypothesis is supported, this will provide compelling evidence to suggest that personalized and perpetually adaptive support can enhance PA more effectively than intervention elements commonly used in digital health worksite wellness programs. If the trial is successful, the results will provide justification to explore both the control optimization trial approach and self-experimentation approach for other complex, idiosyncratic, and dynamic behaviors such as weight management, smoking, or substance abuse. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05598996; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05598996. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/70599.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,031 | 0,031 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,010 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,068 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».