MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411225573 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.45286

SOUTH AFRICAN USERS’ FUNCTION AND EXPERIENCE WITH A MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL MICROPROCESSOR KNEE: A MIXED METHODS STUDY

2025· article· en· W4411225573 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Surona Visagie, Benje Theron

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWilcoxon signed-rank testTest (biology)Descriptive statisticsAmputationMedicinePhysical therapyThematic analysisPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyQualitative researchSurgeryMann–Whitney U testMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Microprocessor knees (MPKs) support safe and confident prosthetic walking. Their cost often prohibits prescription in low-and middle- income settings like South Africa. Funding of high-end prosthetic products in South Africa is dependent on justifications that explain why the component is prescribed, and how it can improve the user`s function. There is little local evidence to support these justifications. OBJECTIVE: To explore and describe South African users’ function and experience with the Rheo XC microprocessor knee (MPK). METHODOLOGY: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used. A pre-test, post-test study was followed by a descriptive qualitative study to explore and explain the observed outcomes. In the pre-test phase, baseline data were collected while participants used their regular non-microprocessor knees (e.g., mechanical or hydraulic joints). Post-test data were collected after a two-week trial with the Rheo XC knee joint. Data were collected from 16 consecutively sampled participants, using a self-developed functional level scale and the L-Test. Nine (56.3%) participants had a transfemoral amputation, six (37.5%) had a knee disarticulation and one (6.3%) had bilateral amputations (transtibial and transfemoral). Baseline and follow-up data were paired for each participant and analyzed with the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. The descriptive qualitative study explored six purposively sampled participants’ experiences of the trial knee through semi-structured interviews. Inductive thematic analysis was done. FINDINGS: The time to complete the L-Test decreased on average 7.5 s between baseline (35.4 s) and post-test (27.9 s) data. L-Test Wilcoxon Singed-rank findings showed a significant increase in walking speed (p < 0.001). Mean functional level scores increased by an average of 12.7 points (p < 0.001) with improvements observed across all activities except running, for which scores remained unchanged. Two themes emerged from the qualitative data. Theme 1: Acceptance of the MPK showed enthusiasm for the MPK. However, Theme 2: Real-world limitations of the MPK cautioned that the MPK is not suitable for everybody. CONCLUSION: This study provides context specific scientific evidence that may support funding decisions for MPKs in South Africa. However, it is not suitable for everyone, and a trial period to assess appropriateness is advised before prescription. The test period in this study was short, and further research over longer durations is recommended. Layman's Abstract Prosthetic knees with computer-controlled systems help users walk more safely and confidently; however, they are expensive and not commonly used in low- and middle-income countries such as South Africa. Medical aids and other private funders sometimes cover the cost based on justifications that explain why the prosthesis is prescribed and how it can improve the user's function. Currently prosthetists have little evidence to support these justifications. This study assesses South African users’ function and experiences with one such knee, the Rheo XC knee. Sixteen participants tried the Rheo XC knee for two weeks. Before they started the trial period, they completed questions on their function and a timed walk test while using their own non-microprocessor knees (e.g. mechanical or hydraulic joints). After the two-week trial of the Rheo XC knee, they repeated the same tests to determine if their function or walking speed improved. Nine (56.3%) participants had an above knee amputation, six (37.5%) had a through knee amputation and one (6.3%) had bilateral amputations (below and above the knee). Baseline and follow-up data were paired for each participant and analyzed with a statistical test. Interviews were conducted with six selected participants to learn about their experiences using the Rheo XC knee. Participants walked on average 7.5 s faster with the Rheo XC knee than with their usual knee. They also had higher function scores for all activities except running, which remained the same. Although participants liked the Rheo XC knee, its length and weight posed challenges for certain individuals. The findings of this study may help justify funding for the Rheo XC knee in South Africa. However, it is recommended that the Rheo XC knee be prescribed only after a trial period has been completed to ensure it is an appropriate choice for the specific user. The test period used in the study was short, and further research over longer duration is recommended. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/45286/33986 How To Cite: Visagie S, Theron B. South African users’ function and experience with a magnetorheological microprocessor knee: A mixed methods study. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2025; Volume 8, Issue 1, No. 5. Https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.45286 Corresponding Author: Surona Visagie, PhDAffiliation: University of Stellenbosch, Division of Disability and Rehabilitation Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, South Africa.E-Mail: suronav@sun.ac.zaORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4575-479X

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,164
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,932

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,248
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalMême sujetProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsTravaux en français237 207