MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411227069 · doi:10.33540/2932

Untapped potential: Opportunities and challenges for self-led contact tracing during outbreaks of communicable diseases

2025· dissertation· en· W4411227069 sur OpenAlexaff
Yannick B Helms

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueCOVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Établissements canadiensInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContact tracingOutbreakTracingBusinessMedicinePolitical scienceComputer scienceVirologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Infectious disease (medical specialty)PathologyDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Outbreaks of communicable diseases such as COVID-19 can significantly threaten individual wellbeing and societal functioning. To contain such outbreaks, public health services (PHS) implement contact tracing (CT). In this process, a public health professional (PHP) interviews an infected individual (‘case’) to identify people they were in contact with during their infectious period (‘contacts’) and informs them about the necessary measures to prevent further transmission of the pathogen. However, CT can be challenging during large outbreaks due to the high numbers of cases and contacts, time and resource demands, and limited cooperation. In this thesis, we investigated whether and how CT can be improved by more actively involving cases and contacts in tasks typically performed by PHPs, supported by digital tools. We refer to this approach as ‘self-led’ CT. In part one of this thesis, we examined the use of web-based respondent-driven sampling (webRDS) in public health. A scoping review showed that webRDS has been successfully used to recruit participants for research on various topics, deliver health interventions, and support case finding. Peer recruitment can be stimulated by offering adequate incentives, conducting formative research into recruitment barriers, and thoroughly motivating ‘seeds’ to initiate recruitment. In part two, we explored PHPs’ perspectives on self-led CT through interviews and surveys. PHPs were generally positive, anticipating that self-led CT could make the process more efficient and enable more autonomous participation. However, they also expressed concerns about losing oversight and the ability to support cases and contacts. PHPs considered self-led CT appropriate when dealing with digitally skilled and motivated individuals, and during outbreaks involving relatively many cases and contacts. They considered self-led CT less suitable in high-risk or complex situations. PHPs emphasized that self-led CT should complement—not replace—provider-initiated CT and recommended maintaining options for personal support. In part three, we investigated citizens’ perspectives on self-led CT during the COVID-19 pandemic using interviews and surveys. Citizens generally indicated to be willing to participate in self-led CT. Their willingness depended on various factors, including previous experiences with CT, sense of responsibility, self-efficacy, perceived impact, trust in digital tools, and privacy concerns. Citizens recommended enabling early participation, minimizing data collection, and offering both autonomous and supported options within the CT process. In part four, we conducted an experimental online questionnaire study to compare different approaches to support citizens in recalling and reporting their contacts. We found that using context-specific recall cues and asking participants to list contacts separately for different situations increased the number of reported contacts, but also raised the risk of participant dropout. Furthermore, not all additionally elicited contacts may equally contribute to CT effectiveness. Our findings suggest that self-led CT may be less feasible for individuals with many or high-risk contacts. In the final part of the thesis, we discuss limitations, opportunities for future research, and propose a framework for integrating self-led and provider-initiated CT to maximize benefits while addressing potential challenges.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,510
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetCOVID-19 Digital Contact TracingTravaux en français237 207