Evaluation of Free-Living Motor Symptoms in Patients With Parkinson Disease Through Smartwatches: Protocol for Defining Digital Biomarkers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Monitoring motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) presents significant challenges due to the complex nature of symptom progression, variations in medication responses, and the fluctuations that can occur throughout the day. Traditional neurological visits provide only a limited perspective of a patient's overall condition, with challenges in achieving accurate and objective assessments of symptoms. To bridge this gap, extended monitoring in nonclinical settings could play a critical role in personalizing treatments and improving their efficacy. Wearable devices have emerged as potential tools for assessing PD symptom severity; however, studies integrating both in-clinic and free-living conditions, as well as multiday monitoring, remain scarce. Defining digital biomarkers that provide valuable insights into motor symptoms could enable comprehensive monitoring and tracking of PD in various contexts, facilitating more precise medication adjustments and the implementation of advanced therapeutic strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to collect a dataset to support the proposal and definition of digital biomarkers of PD motor symptoms using wearable devices. Data will be collected both in a supervised setting and continuously in a remote, free-living context during participants' normal daily activities; the study will include patients with PD and healthy controls. The goal is to identify reliable digital biomarkers that can effectively distinguish patients with PD from healthy controls and classify disease severity in both supervised and unsupervised free-living environments. METHODS: This paper outlines a protocol for an observational case-control study aimed at assessing motor symptoms in patients with PD using a smartwatch. The smartwatch will record accelerometer, gyroscope, and physical activity data. Participants will be instructed to perform a series of exercises guided via a smartphone. Measurements will be collected in 2 settings: a supervised clinical environment, with motor symptoms assessments conducted at the beginning and end of the study, and in an unsupervised free-living context for 1 week. In both settings, participants will be required to wear the smartwatch while performing the same set of exercises. In their daily routine, participants will be required to wear the smartwatch continuously throughout the day, removing it only at night for charging. RESULTS: Participant recruitment and data collection started in December 2024 and will continue until spring 2025. The study aims to enroll 20 participants with PD and 20 healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: It is anticipated that the generation of a dataset of accelerometer and gyroscope signal data recorded from patients with PD at various stages of the disease, alongside data from a control group, will enable robust comparative and impactful analyses. In addition, the study seeks to develop analytical techniques capable of tracking PD symptoms in real-life scenarios, both in everyday settings and clinical environments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06817772; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06817772. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/72820.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,021 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».