Abstract PS19-04: Exploring the broad societal value of pembrolizumab in triple-negative breast cancer in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: The impact of breast cancer is multifaceted; for each patient there are personal, social, and financial consequences which have wider societal and economic consequences. Cost-effectiveness analyses for health technology assessment (HTA) purposes are predominantly conducted from the traditional payer perspective and often do not capture these wider impacts. Pembrolizumab, a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody indicated for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), has demonstrated substantial survival benefits to patients. Our study analyzes the traditional societal and broader societal net monetary benefit (NMB) of pembrolizumab-based therapies for early TNBC (eTNBC) and metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) in a Canadian setting. We incorporate novel elements of value described in the third ISPOR Special Task Force Report alongside new elements considered relevant to the disease. METHODS: Two validated and HTA approved cost-effectiveness models for pembrolizumab in eTNBC and mTNBC were expanded to include elements constituting the broad societal perspective. For the traditional societal perspective, this included productivity. For the broad societal perspective, the additional elements included caregiver burden, insurance value, value of hope, real option value, severity of disease, out-of-pocket expenses, and fertility treatment costs. A targeted literature review was conducted to identify inputs for each element. A standard of care comparator, consisting of chemotherapy, was generated for each indication; formed of a weighted average of the various chemotherapy comparators by indication based on market share. Canadian list prices were used for all treatment acquisition costs. An overall NMB was generated across indications by weighting individual results by prevalence and using a willingness to pay threshold of CAD$100,000. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and scenario analyses were implemented to analyze the robustness of results to plausible variation. Results: The results showed that adopting a broad societal perspective resulted in more favourable cost-effectiveness results. Specifically, the overall broad societal NMB was CAD$1,113,858, almost four times greater than the traditional payer (CAD$282,644) and traditional societal NMB (CAD$279,534). For mTNBC, the NMB was positive for the broad societal perspective whereas the two traditional perspectives yielded a negative NMB. For eTNBC, pembrolizumab consistently resulted in a positive NMB for all three perspectives, however the broad societal perspective resulted in a substantially higher NMB. This was largely driven by the substantial insurance value impact on quality-adjusted life years. The next most influential element was the value of hope. PSA was consistent with deterministic results. Scenario analysis demonstrated that the choice of input source used to inform the broad elements of value had a substantial impact on NMB. Discussion: The inclusion of broader societal elements of value resulted in a significantly higher NMB than the traditional payer perspective for both indications, indicating that society as a whole may place a substantially greater value on access to treatment than suggested from a traditional payer perspective. However, the paucity of disease-specific input data and the uncertain estimation of some of the broad societal perspective elements of value result in challenges with interpretation. Overall, the research highlights the importance of considering alternative and broader perspectives of analysis in health technology evaluation, but more research is needed to robustly parameterize novel elements of value. Notably, this study indicates that the traditional payer and societal perspectives commonly used for HTA may be missing key elements of value, and thus underestimate the value that general societal places on access to innovative therapies. Citation Format: Kate Young Brook E, Madin-Warburton M; Wijenayake N; Mishkin K; Meilleur M-C; Davies A. Exploring the broad societal value of pembrolizumab in triple-negative breast cancer in Canada [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2024; 2024 Dec 10-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PS19-04.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,014 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».