MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411319573 · doi:10.1111/cea.70096

Prevalence of Mental Health Symptoms in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2025· review· en· W4411319573 sur OpenAlexaff
Daniel Rayner, David Gou, Jennifer Lin, Grace Xiong, Alessandra Giglia, Lola Irelewuyi, Shreya Bera

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical & Experimental Allergy · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDermatology and Skin Diseases
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAtopic dermatitisMedicineMeta-analysisDermatologyMEDLINEMental healthPsychiatryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Atopic dermatitis (AD) represents a significant challenge to patients through uncontrolled symptoms, including itch, oedema, xerosis, crusting, and oozing [1, 2]. In large part due to mental health comorbidities, AD has the highest disease burden among skin diseases, leading to poor sleep, impedance of daily activities, and decreased quality of life [3, 4]. A recent meta-analysis found the prevalence of depression and anxiety to be 20%–24% and 11%–14% in patients with AD, respectively [5]. However, the prevalence of patients with AD who have subthreshold psychiatric symptoms remains uncertain [5]. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prevalence of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and sleep disturbances in patients with AD. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024566580) and was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 statement. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL up to July 5, 2024, and hand-searched the reference lists of included studies. Pairs of reviewers independently screened studies in two stages to identify studies reporting on depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, or sleep disturbances in patients with AD. We extracted data related to study design, participant characteristics, and outcome prevalences at the earliest timepoint and lowest threshold. We conducted DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analyses of proportions using the metan function in STATA (v18) and logit-transformed prevalences before pooling. We explored sources of heterogeneity through pre-specified subgroup analysis and meta-regression, quantified heterogeneity using Cochran's Q test and the I2 statistic, assessed study risk of bias using Hoy et al.'s validated tool for studies of prevalence [6], identified publication bias using funnel plots and Egger's tests, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We screened 11,381 citations, assessed 377 full-texts for eligibility, and included 93 studies. These studies included 488,473 patients with AD, with a median mean age of 37.0 years and a median of 55.3% females. From 66 studies (n = 474,598), the pooled prevalence of depressive symptoms in patients with AD was 29.6% (95% CI 25.9%–33.5%, low certainty) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 99.0%, p < 0.001; Table 1). From 43 studies (n = 21,730), the prevalence of anxiety symptoms was 36.7% (95% CI 30.4%–43.6%, low certainty) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 98.7%, p < 0.001; Table 1). From 30 studies (n = 13,451), the prevalence of sleep disturbances was 65.2% (95% CI 56.5%–72.9%, low certainty; Table 1) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 98.7%, p < 0.001). Anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and sleep disturbances were more prevalent in patients from the South-East Asian region (anxiety symptoms 48.1%, 95% CI 37.6%–58.9%; depressive symptoms 56.8%, 95% CI 45.9%–67.0%; sleep disturbances 86.7%, 95% CI 74.7%–93.5%) and less prevalent in the Eastern Mediterranean region (anxiety symptoms 21.4%, 95% CI 12.7%–33.8%, subgroup p-value < 0.001; depressive symptoms 10.7%, 95% CI 5.0%–21.5%, subgroup p-value = 0.024; sleep disturbances 32.6%, 95% CI 24.0%–42.6%, subgroup p-value < 0.001). Additionally, there were differences in prevalence based on the tools and thresholds used to assess mental health symptoms. The most common screening tools used were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for depressive symptoms (28 [42%] studies; most common threshold ≥ 8, 20 studies, prevalence 30.0%, 95% CI 24.5%–36.2%) and anxiety symptoms (27 [63%] studies; most common threshold ≥ 8, 19 studies, prevalence 42.4%, 95% CI 36.1%–48.9%), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index for sleep disturbances (7 [23%] studies; most common threshold ≥ 5, 3 studies, prevalence 79.0%, 95% CI 70.5%–85.6%). Meta-regression analyses for age, sex, or AD severity revealed no significant associations. Publication bias was detected in studies reporting on depressive symptoms (Egger's test p = 0.001) and was not detected for other outcomes. Additional information about study methods and findings is available at https://osf.io/wnbjf/. 29.6 (25.9–33.5) Low Due to serious inconsistency and the detection of publication biasa 36.7 (30.4–43.6) Low Due to very serious inconsistencyb 65.2 (56.5–72.9) Low Due to very serious inconsistencyb Our review has several notable strengths. We performed a comprehensive literature search and did not exclude based on language or publication status. We also performed a priori subgroup analysis and meta-regression to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. However, our findings are also limited by the quality of the available evidence. We observed significant heterogeneity across all outcomes, particularly in the variation in screening tools and thresholds employed between studies, which limits the generalizability of our pooled estimates. Notably, we found that AD severity did not predict the prevalence of mental health symptoms, which conflicts with prior evidence [7]. This suggests that existing interventions tailored towards improving traditional AD-related health outcomes, including overall AD severity and itch severity, may not sufficiently address patients' mental health needs, underscoring the potential need for interventions specifically targeting anxiety and depression in patients with AD. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 93 studies identified the high prevalence of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and sleep disturbances in patients with AD. Our findings, combined with the lack of mental health and patient well-being discussions during clinical encounters [8], highlight the need for clinicians to actively consider the psychological effects of AD and to integrate patient education and psychological interventions into treatment plans. Further research on prevention, detection, and management strategies is needed to address the mental health needs of patients with AD. Daniel G. Rayner: conceptualisation; methodology; formal analysis; investigation; writing – original draft; visualisation; supervision; project administration. David Gou: validation; formal analysis; investigation; writing – original draft; visualisation; supervision; project administration. Jennifer Lin: investigation; writing – review and editing. Grace Xiong: investigation; writing – review and editing. Alessandra Giglia: investigation; writing – review and editing. Lola Irelewuyi: investigation; writing – review and editing. Jason Jianxin Zhao: investigation; writing – review and editing. Shreya Bera: investigation; writing – review and editing. The authors have nothing to report. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The data that support the findings of this review are publicly available in OSF at https://osf.io/wnbjf/.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,492
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0100,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,407
Écart entre enseignants0,368 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical & Experimental AllergyMême sujetDermatology and Skin DiseasesTravaux en français237 207