MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411326375 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1623554

Editorial: Evolution of crop genomes and epigenomes, volume II

2025· editorial· en· W4411326375 sur OpenAlexaff
Hai Du, Zhe Liang, Andrés J. Cortés

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Plant Science · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Établissements canadiensBiotechnology Research Institute
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Science Foundation of ChongqingVetenskapsrådet
Mots-clésGenomeCropBiologyComputational biologyEvolutionary biologyComputer scienceGeneticsEcologyGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

sequencing, machine learning, and bioinformatics (Cortés & López-Hernández, 2021) have accelerated crop genome research (Corté s et al., 2023), revealing how domestication reshaped genomes/epigenomes (Purugganan, 2022).A deeper understanding of these evolutionary constrains and changes is crucial for developing superior and sustainable crop varieties with enhanced yield, nutritional value, and stress resilience. This Research Topic explores crop genome/epigenome evolution through multi-omics analyses, compiling discoveries across gene families, pathways, and diverse species. This topic comprises five original research articles focusing on the above research areas, viewed 6,301 times by the time of this Editorial. These works enable readers to (i) quantify the scale of divergence and conservation of genomes and epigenomes during crop evolution, (ii) reconstruct the evolutionary history of target gene families and pathways, (iii) expand the paradigm of molecular evolution to acknowledge variable gene expression, gene regulatory and metabolomic profiles into what nowadays can be recognized as multi-omic evolution, (iv) identify patters and causal relationships between genome size, genome duplication/polyploidy, and the occurrence of key evolutionary innovations, and ultimately (v) interpret the metabolomic/phenotypic consequences of genome/epigenome evolution. All insights leverage large-scale multi-omics data with biotech/agricultural applications. analyses revealed significant structural variations and phylogenetic relationships. For instance, the authors found that the mitogenomes exhibited complex, graph-based structures with multiple junctions. They identified a total of 51 unique genes in the mitogenomes, including 32 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 16 tRNA genes, and 3 rRNA genes. Authors also traced the sequences transferred from the chloroplast to the mitogenome, with M. sinensis showing the highest transfer length and proportion. Based on the phylogenetic analysis of 13 conserved mitochondrial PCGs, the authors concluded that N. porphyrocoma was the closest relative to Saccharum. They also unveiled the extensive genomic rearrangements among the mitogenomes, and highlighted the dynamic nature of mitochondrial genome evolution, including gene duplication and loss, with the ATP synthase and cytochrome c synthesis genes being the most conserved likely due to puryfing selection. The significance of this study lies in its contribution to comparative genomic studies and the enrichment of genomic resources relevant to sugarcane breeding. The identification of structural variations and phylogenetic insights directly address the need for more comparative studies and mechanistic understanding of organelle evolution.Ultimately, this study enriches the mitochondrial genomic resources for Saccharinae and provides new insights into the evolution of mitogenomes at the family and genus levels. The findings highlighted in this Research Topic lay the foundation for innovative research in the nascent field of multi-omic evolution. Among the several key areas that warrant further exploration, expanding the species scope is perhaps the most imperative.The studies presented here focus on a select group of crop species, yet future research should expand the species spectrum to encompass a broader representation of crops, particularly those with unique evolutionary histories (e.g., Corté s et al., 2018), orphan research (Hu et al., 2025), or paramount importance for the food security (e.g., López-Herná ndez et al., 2023), nutrition (Wu et al., 2020;Wu et al., 2024), sustainability (Benitez-Alfonso et al., 2023) and self-sufficiency (Scherer et al., 2020;Varshney et al., 2021b) targets. This will enlighten more generalizable patterns of crop genome and epigenome evolution.Second, but not less important, a more prominent integration of epigenetic regulation is desirable. Epigenetic modifications play a crucial role in shaping gene expression (Chinnusamy and Zhu, 2009) and phenotypic plasticity (Kristensen et al., 2020;Fox et al., 2019), yet are often disregarded by studies focusing on the latter paradigms (Bossdorf et al., 2008). Oncoming research should aim integrating epigenomic data (e.g., DNA methylation, histone modifications) with genomic and transcriptomic data to build a more comprehensive understanding of the evolutionary constrains shaping crop genomes and epigenomes, and their phenotypic consequences.On a third note, interpreting evolution across the multi-omics continuum requires more advanced modeling techniques. The development of sophisticated computational models capable of predicting the multi-dimensional downstream consequences of genomic and epigenomic variations on crop traits and metabolomes is crucial. These models should be capable to simultaneously integrate multiple data types and incorporate information on gene regulatory networks and their environmental interactions. The current machine learning boom (Varshney, 2021) promises assisting in these matters (Libbrecht and Noble, 2015;Schrider and Kern, 2018).While substantial progress has been made in recognizing major trends and causes during crop genome evolution, as illustrated by this Research Topic, critical knowledge gaps remain. A more comprehensive understanding requires the integration of diverse data types genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic, and metabolomicto build a holistic picture of evolutionary changes at intricate omic levels (Barrera-Redondo et al., 2020). Meanwhile, further comparative studies across closely related species are essential to disentangle common evolutionary trajectories (Wolf and Ellegren, 2017) from unique adaptations driven by specific environmental pressures or selective breeding (Feng et al., 2024).Despite recent efforts in these last two fronts, the mechanistic comprehension of coupled genomic and epigenomic changes, and their downstream consequences, are still in its infancy. Therefore, identifying the key genes and regulatory pathways involved, as well as their environmental context (Corté s et al., 2022;Lasky et al., 2023), is crucial for a complete understating of these evolutionary processes. Equally important, translating fundamental mechanistic knowledge into practical applications for crop improvement is critical, especially due to a limited adoption of innovation by farmers (Kholova et al., 2024). This will require strategies that harness multi-omic evolutionary novelty to speed breeding programs aiming at the design of crops with superior resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses (Varshney et al., 2021a;Corté s, 2024), without disregarding their market value and the farmers' preferences (Peláez et al., 2022).Visualizing these novel trends in the field of multi-omic evolution will in turn impact other transgressive technologies, such as gene editing. Target genes and regulatory elements identified as part of these studies can be manipulated by unprecedented genome editing tools such as CRISPR/Cas9 (Doudna and Charpentier, 2014). For instance, this approach is now allowing precise editions to test gene functionality in crop backgrounds, and eventually leverage them for fast-forward improvement (Dort et al., 2020), while

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,079

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0040,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0070,004
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,014

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,002
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in Plant ScienceMême sujetCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringTravaux en français237 207