Empowering community and philanthropic funders: The case for investment in non-market housing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aotearoa New Zealand is in the middle of a prolonged housing crisis. This is marked by a chronic undersupply of private and non-market housing which has created social, health, and economic inequities. Māori communities are disproportionately affected, consistently experiencing the highest rates of housing insecurity, overcrowding, and unaffordability. Over 20,000 households remain on the social housing waitlist, while private rental costs continue to escalate. The reasons for the housing crisis are complex, structural and deeply entrenched. Housing access and affordability also remain poor across other developed countries, with particularly severe challenges in Commonwealth nations like Canada and Australia, where rising costs and stagnant wages have made homeownership increasingly unattainable for many. This research inquiry investigates how philanthropic and community funders can use impact investments to play their part in addressing the housing crisis. A pragmatism mixed-methodology model was used, including desktop research, namely reviewing literature and data analysis, semi-structured interviews and surveys. This employed purposive sampling and the participants were funders, third-party financiers and housing providers to give a sector wide overview. The exploration shows that philanthropic capital can increase non-market housing supply by providing adaptable, long-term funding unavailable through traditional markets. Collaborative financing, integrating public, private, and charitable resources, is essential to increase housing supply. Sector capacity requires strengthening to manage intricate financial and development arrangements. For Māori, there is a need for culturally responsive and flexible funding, particularly on whenua Māori, where standard financing is unavailable due to restrictive banking and regulatory conditions. Findings advocate for a centralised financing platform to consolidate diverse capital sources and bolster the sector’s financial and governance expertise. Regulatory adjustments are proposed to ease borrowing costs and align frameworks with social housing’s extended, low-profit timelines. Tailored funding solutions for Māori, crafted with iwi, government, and philanthropists, are deemed necessary to address systemic obstacles and advance self-determination. Measuring social outcomes via tools like Social Return on Investment (SROI) is recommended to demonstrate value and draw additional investment. Strong, bipartisan political resolve is urged to allocate substantial resources and coordinate efforts across parties. These measures position philanthropic and community funders as central to expanding non-market housing, offering a practical means to mitigate Aotearoa New Zealand’s housing crisis and foster equitable outcomes, especially for Māori.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».