MDO of Robotic Landing Gear Systems: A Hybrid Belt-Driven Compliant Mechanism for VTOL Drones Application
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper addresses inherent limitations in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) undercarriages hindering vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) capabilities on uneven slopes and obstacles. Robotic landing gear (RLG) designs have been proposed to address these limitations; however, existing designs are typically limited to ground slopes of 6–15°, beyond which rollover would happen. Moreover, articulated RLG concepts come with added complexity and weight penalties due to multiple drivetrain components. Previous research has highlighted that even a minor 3-degree slope change can increase the dynamic rollover risks by 40%. Therefore, the design optimization of robotic landing gear for enhanced VTOL capabilities requires a multidisciplinary framework that integrates static analysis, dynamic simulation, and control strategies for operations on complex terrain. This paper presents a novel, hybrid, compliant, belt-driven, three-legged RLG system, supported by a multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) methodology, aimed at achieving enhanced VTOL capabilities on uneven surfaces and moving platforms like ship decks. The proposed system design utilizes compliant mechanisms featuring a series of three-flexure hinges (3SFH), to reduce the number of articulated drivetrain components and actuators. This results in a lower system weight, improved energy efficiency, and enhanced durability, compared to earlier fully actuated, articulated, four-legged, two-jointed designs. Additionally, the compliant belt-driven actuation mitigates issues such as backlash, wear, and high maintenance, while enabling smoother torque transfer and improved vibration damping relative to earlier three-legged cable-driven four-bar link RLG systems. The use of lightweight yet strong materials—aluminum and titanium—enables the legs to bend 19 and 26.57°, respectively, without failure. An animated simulation of full-contact landing tests, performed using a proportional-derivative (PD) controller and ship deck motion input, validate the performance of the design. Simulations are performed for a VTOL UAV, with two flexible legs made of aluminum, incorporating circular flexure hinges, and a passive third one positioned at the tail. The simulation results confirm stable landings with a 2 s settling time and only 2.29° of overshoot, well within the FAA-recommended maximum roll angle of 2.9°. Compared to the single-revolute (1R) model, the implementation of the optimal 3R Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model (PRBM) further improves accuracy by achieving a maximum tip deflection error of only 1.2%. It is anticipated that the proposed hybrid design would also offer improved durability and ease of maintenance, thereby enhancing functionality and safety in comparison with existing robotic landing gear systems.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle