Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Biblical scholarship has experienced a marked increase in work at the intersection of ritual studies and the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible (HB). Alongside anthropologists and archaeologists, recent generations of biblical scholars have re-examined the Priestly literature of the HB in league with emerging ritual theories from anthropology and comparative studies from the ancient Near East. Definitions of ritual within these studies are beholden to various proposals about religion, the history of religions, source criticism, sociological models, and anthropologies with their respective philosophies of mind. Apart from early 20th-century attempts to find universal interpretations of ritual, functional approaches asked: What are rituals for? What differentiates a normal action (e.g., eating) into a ritual (e.g., animal sacrifice)? And, for biblical scholars, what do rituals do in the literature of the HB? How are the various rituals, found across the HB, related to each other in form or aim? Rituals in the HB are multi-valent, employed to various ends with proliferating effects. Thus, understanding the HB’s textual accounts of rituals as a system of behaviors and strategies allows for understanding rituals as a nexus of activities, cultural beliefs, and formation of the social and individual body. The twin difficulties of access to only the textualized accounts of rituals and the cultural/temporal distance from their practice frames these discussions of rites in the biblical literature. Rather than decoding the symbols of rituals, the HB’s use of rituals to produce particular kinds of community agents might provide a way to understand the logic of biblical rituals, even if interpreting their precise meanings cannot be assumed. A brief survey of rituals beginning in the primeval history in Israel’s literature will lead to the contest between prescribed rituals, on one hand, and how to understand various attempts to improvise on those biblical prescriptions, on the other. The HB’s internal discourse about rituals and the prophetic critique of malformed rites should also figure into any understanding of biblical rituals, what makes a rite work. Finally, the unique framing of rituals in the HB is contrasted with the general use of rites elsewhere in the ancient Near East. Unlike almost anywhere else in the ancient Near East, Israel’s ritual efficacy is bound to the nation’s ethical behaviors prior to ritual sacrifices and ensuing them. Hence, ritual practices attempt to produce a particular kind of person in and through Israel’s ethical and discerning community. Moreover, many of the rites in the HB have epistemological goals: “so that you all will know.” These two integral aspects of biblical rituals, ethical and epistemic, might suggest that the HB offers a distinct view of rituals among Israel’s peer ritual text traditions in the ancient Near East.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».