MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411368955 · doi:10.3389/fnut.2025.1637728

Editorial: Nutrition and neurobehaviors

2025· editorial· en· W4411368955 sur OpenAlexaff
Lina Begdache, Nazlı Nur Aslan Çin, Nafisa M. Jadavji

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Nutrition · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDiet and metabolism studies
Établissements canadiensCarleton University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The interplay between nutrition and brain health has become a critical area of research.Examining how dietary choices impact cognitive function, mental well-being, and the risk profile of neurodegenerative diseases (1). A growing body of evidence demonstrates that diet significantly influences biochemical pathways regulating brain structure and function. Several nutrients play pivotal roles in neuroprotection, synaptic plasticity, and the mitigation of oxidative stress and inflammation, which are central to neurodegenerative processes Picone et al. (2). Therefore, diet quality and/or nutrient deficiency can affect brain function at different levels: neurotransmission, homeostasis, neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and neurodevelopment, among many more.Studies included in our Nutrition and Neurobehaviors special issue highlight the critical interplay between nutrition and brain health, emphasizing the role of diet in cognitive function, mental well-being, and neurodegenerative disease risk. Evidence shows that high diet quality modulates biochemical pathways regulating brain structure and function. With nutrients like omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals playing essential roles in neuroprotection, synaptic plasticity, and mitigating oxidative stress and inflammation, which are key contributors to the neurodegenerative processes Picone et al. (2).The Mediterranean diet, abundant in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and healthy fats, is rich in antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals that neutralize free radicals linked to neuronal degeneration Picone et al. Bioactive compounds present in the Mediterranean diet, such as polyphenols and omega-3 fatty acids, contribute to epigenetic mechanisms like DNA methylation and histone modification, reducing inflammation and activating antioxidant pathways (3). These compounds also modulate the gut-brain axis, a bidirectional communication system influenced by diet. A healthy, fiber-rich gut microbiota enhances cognitive function and emotional resilience through neural, endocrine, and immune interactions (4). For instance, Huang et al. reported that individuals with suicidal ideation had lower fiber intake, suggesting that dietary fiber may influence suicidal thoughts by modulating the gut microbiota's microbial composition and enhancing serotonin synthesis. Serotonin, a critical neurotransmitter in emotional regulation, is associated with an increased risk of suicidal behavior at low levels (5) . Additionally, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), produced from dietary fiber fermentation, can inhibit histone deacetylases, induce epigenetic modifications, and upregulate brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, potentially reducing suicide risk (6).Conversely, Western diets high ultra-processed foods and refined sugars, disrupt the gut microbiota, potentially exacerbating neuroinflammation and psychosis. Kennedy et al. reported that individuals with psychosis consumed diets higher in processed carbohydrates and refined sugars, which may destabilize the gut microbiome and increase insulin resistance Kennedy et al. (7). Anti-inflammatory diets rich in omega-3 fatty acids, cruciferous vegetables, and probiotics and low in processed carbohydrates and refined sugars have been shown to regulate metabolic processes through SCFA production, which is commonly disturbed in psychiatric disorders Furthermore, RJ consumption is hypothesized to enhance the production of neurotrophins such as BDNF and nerve growth factor (NGF), promoting synaptogenesis, neurogenesis, and acetylcholine production (12). Both studies advocate for a delicate approach to nutritional research, recognizing that factors such as health status, sex-specific differences, and nutrient interactions play crucial roles in mental health outcomesThe relationship between diet and anxiety is complex and influenced by multiple interconnected factors (13)(14)(15)(16). Recent research highlights the pivotal role of the gut microbiome as a key mediator of mental health. Nutrient-dense diets provide antioxidants, prebiotics, and probiotics essential for brain and gut health. Western diets are associated with increased anxietylike behaviors, potentially due to their contribution to stress Basso et al. A primary mechanism underlying this relationship appears to be the pro-inflammatory nature of these foods inducing dysbiosis, and amplifying the stress response. The lack of fiber and other prebiotic agents reduces beneficial butyrate-producing bacteria such as Faecalibacterium and Roseburia, which are known to mitigate stress-related mood decline. Butyrate, a short-chain fatty acid, supports colonic health and inflammation management, potentially contributing to its anxiolytic effects. Additionally, a high intake of added sugars promotes an increase in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio while reducing butyrate-producing bacteria. Likewise, trans-fatty acids and processed meats negatively impact microbial diversity, further reinforcing the connection between unhealthy dietary choices and a compromised gut microbiome.In contrast, diets rich in fruits, vegetables, and fiber promote beneficial gut bacteria, reducing inflammation and enhancing gut health. Individuals consuming a high intake of fruits and vegetables exhibit greater Faecalibacterium abundance compared to those in a placebo group.Similarly, fermented vegetable consumption has been linked to increased levels of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Roseburia faecis. Whole-grain intake also positively influences these beneficial bacteria. Rodríguez-Rangel et al. linked microbiota imbalances to binge-type eating behaviors and heightened susceptibility to anxiety-like behaviors. Research on specific nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids, has yielded mixed results regarding anxiety outcome.Discrepancies may stem from variations in study design, sample size, and the type of omega-3 fatty acids examined. Additionally, factors such as age, sex, and overall health status may mediate these effects, stressing the need for personalized research approaches. Notably, sex-specific effects have been observed, with dietary components and gut bacteria exerting different effects on males and females. For example, a positive association exists between red meat consumption and anxiety in females but conflicting results in males. Moreover, specific gut bacteria exhibit sex-dependent associations with anxiety symptoms, further emphasizing the complexity of this relationship.highlight the impact of early microbiome establishment on maternal mental health. The observed decline in exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates among mothers with PPD may be exacerbated by dietary factors that disrupt the gut microbiome, leading to decreased levels of beneficial bacteria known to mitigate stress-related mood decline. In regions where access to nutrient-dense foods is limited, mothers may be particularly vulnerable to gut dysbiosis, worsening PPD symptoms Kedir

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,032
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,108

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0050,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,004
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0070,004
Science ouverte0,0050,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0150,014
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0320,021

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in NutritionMême sujetDiet and metabolism studiesTravaux en français237 207