MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411395488 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.05.391

LB0004 RANDOMISED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PHASE II STUDY OF ORAL ENPATORAN, A FIRST-IN-CLASS TOLL-LIKE RECEPTOR 7/8 INHIBITOR, IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

2025· article· en· W4411395488 sur OpenAlexaff
Eric F. Morand, Maria Dall’Era, Jorge Sánchez‐Guerrero, Dess Pearson, Victoria P. Werth, Joerg Wenzel, S. Roy, Christine Kleinmond, Ruth Fernandez‐Ruiz, Lena Klopp‐Schulze, Hans Gühring, F. Moreau, Richard Furie

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Établissements canadiensToronto Western HospitalMount Sinai Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePlaceboInternal medicineImmunologyPharmacologyDermatologyAlternative medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Current treatments for lupus (including systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE] and cutaneous lupus erythematosus [CLE]) offer inadequate disease control and may be associated with cumulative toxicity. Toll-like receptors (TLR) 7 and TLR8 have functions in innate and adaptive immunity implicated in SLE pathogenesis. Gain-of-function mutations in TLR7 were identified in patients (pts) with SLE, and TLR7/8 signalling pathways play a central role in regulating interferon (IFN) induction. Preclinical data suggest TLR7/8 activation may mediate glucocorticoid (GC) resistance. Enpatoran is a first-in-class, oral small molecule TLR7/8 inhibitor. WILLOW (NCT05162586) is a Phase II randomised double-blind placebo (pbo)-controlled dose-finding parallel adaptive study in adults with SLE or CLE receiving standard of care (SoC) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enpatoran. In Cohort A of WILLOW, enpatoran demonstrated a significant dose response in change from baseline (BL) in Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index-Activity (CLASI-A) vs pbo at Week (wk) 16 in CLE or SLE with active lupus rash. Objectives: Report results from WILLOW Cohort B in pts with active SLE despite SoC. Methods: Pts with SLE of moderate to high disease activity (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group [BILAG] 2004 ≥1A or 2B), and hybrid SELENA-SLEDAI ≥6 and/or CLASI-A ≥8 were enrolled. In Part 1, 60 pts were randomised 1:2 to pbo or enpatoran 100 mg twice daily (BID). Part 2 was then activated, with pts randomised 1:1:1:1 to SoC plus pbo, enpatoran 25 mg BID, 50 mg BID or 100 mg BID for 24 wks. The primary objective was to evaluate the dose-response relationship of enpatoran in reducing disease activity, based on the BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response rate at Wk24. Five dose-response models were tested using one-sided Multiple Comparison Procedure-Modelling methodology to control for multiplicity (all for dose vs BICLA response at Wk24). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included change in type I IFN gene signature (IFN-GS) level, BICLA response with clinically meaningful GC reduction, and BICLA response rate and CLASI-A improvement ≥50%/70% (CLASI-50/70) in pts with CLASI-A score ≥8 at BL. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded. Results: 354 pts were randomised; 353 were evaluated for efficacy (pbo n=94; enpatoran 25 mg BID n=71; 50 mg BID n=74; 100 mg BID n=114). 94.9% of pts were female; median age was 41 years. At BL, most pts had musculoskeletal (92.4%) or mucocutaneous (98.0%) involvement; 85.3% of pts were receiving systemic GC (51.0% a prednisone-equivalent dose ≥10 mg/day). No statistically significant dose-response relationship for enpatoran was identified; all doses were associated with higher BICLA response rates vs pbo (Table 1) with a nominally significant improvement in the 25 mg BID group at Wk24 (nominal p=0.0088). The largest treatment effect occurred in subgroups with high IFN-GS or prednisone-equivalent dose ≥10 mg at BL. Compared with pbo, type I IFN-GS was significantly reduced for all enpatoran doses as early as Wk2 and maintained to Wk24. Higher rates of BICLA response combined with clinically meaningful GC reduction were observed in all enpatoran groups vs pbo (58.8%, 55.6% and 47.5% vs 31.4%). In pts with CLASI-A score ≥8 at BL (pbo n=41; enpatoran 25 mg BID n=29; 50 mg BID n=38; 100 mg BID n=54), BICLA response rates were higher for enpatoran than pbo, and up to 81.5%/60.5% of pts receiving enpatoran had CLASI-50/70 responses, vs 41.5%/26.8% for pbo, respectively at Wk24. There was no clinically meaningful difference in rates of TEAEs between enpatoran and pbo (range: 61%-64%), including the most frequently reported TEAEs, which were infections and infestations. There was no apparent dose-dependent increase in TEAEs, including severe TEAEs, with enpatoran (Table 2). Conclusion: In this Phase II study, enpatoran was well tolerated and exhibited nominally significant improvements in measures of SLE disease activity through Wk24 vs pbo. Enpatoran-mediated downmodulation of IFN-GS confirms the involvement of the TLR7/8 pathway in type I IFN pathway activation in SLE. REFERENCES: NIL . Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank Dominika Weinelt for their support with the study conduct and analysis. Medical writing support was provided by Nicole Jones on behalf of Amica Scientific, Macclesfield, UK, and sponsored by Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Disclosure of Interests: Eric Morand Consulting fees, speaker honoraria and appeared on scientific advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, DragonFly, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Remegen, Quell, UCB, and Zenas (arrangements are direct with author)., Research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech-Hoffman La Roche, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda, and Union Chimique Belge (grants/contracts with Monash University), Maria Dall'Era Maria Dall'Era serves as an advisor for Aurinia, AstraZeneca, GSK and Genentech, and participates in data monitoring committees for Janssen and Cabaletta., Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero is a consultant for Biogen Inc. and EMD Serono., David Pearson Consultant for Biogen Inc., Merck & Co., and Pfizer Inc., Received grant and/or clinical trials support from Daiichi Sankyo Inc., EMD Serono Inc., and Priovant Therapeutics., Victoria P. Werth Consultant for Merck Healthcare KGaA. The University of Pennsylvania owns the copyright for the CLASI., Jörg Wenzel Received honoraria from Merck Healthcare KGaA for advisory activities., Sanjeev Roy Employee of Ares Trading SA, Eysins, Switzerland, an affiliate of Merck KGaA., Christine Kleinmond Employee of Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany., Ruth Fernandez-Ruiz Employee of Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany., Lena Klopp-Schulze Employee of Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany., Hans Gühring Employee of Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany., Flavie Moreau Employee of EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA., Richard A. Furie Received honoraria from Merck Healthcare KGaA for advisory activities. © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,041

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesMême sujetInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsTravaux en français237 207