MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411409949 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.06.1852

ABS0487 RESPONSE TO PLACEBO IN ACTIVE LUPUS NEPHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND POOLED ANALYSIS

2025· review· en· W4411409949 sur OpenAlexaff
Ayesha Nomaan, Mahdiyeh Moin, Philippe‐Antoine Bilodeau, Konstantinos Tselios

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University Medical CentreMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLupus nephritisPlaceboInternal medicineSystemic lupus erythematosusNephritisDermatologyImmunologyPathologyAlternative medicineDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background:</h3> Lupus Nephritis (LN) affects approximately 40% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and may result in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in up to one-third of them 10 years after diagnosis. Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have failed to demonstrate the superiority of biologic drugs over standard-of-care (SoC). <h3>Objectives:</h3> The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the response to placebo (and SoC) in patients with active LN. <h3>Methods:</h3> A systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. The PubMed database was searched (2000 to September 2024) with MeSH term ‘lupus nephritis', for phase II/III RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of biologics in LN. The primary end-point was complete renal response (CRR) defined as patients with proteinuria <0.5 g/day and serum creatinine <120% from baseline at 48 to 52 weeks. Secondary end-points were partial renal response (PRR, 50% improvement in proteinuria and serum creatinine <120% from baseline at 48 to 52 weeks) and overall renal response (CRR + PRR). The expected and actual differential responses were also recorded. Descriptive statistics were used. <h3>Results:</h3> A total of 10 RCTs (n=2318 in total) were included. Placebo-treated patients (n=1006) were mostly females (86.2%), with a mean age of 32.1 years, and a mean disease duration of 29 months. LN histologic classes were class III (26.1%), IV (46.6%), V (7.2%) and mixed (20.0%). Baseline eGFR was 90.5mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup> and baseline UPCR was 3.73mg/mg. Elevated anti-dsDNA titers were detected in 70.1%, low C3 and low C4 in 62.9% and 35.7% respectively. Mean SLEDAI-2K score was 11.5. All patients were treated at baseline with glucocorticoids at a dose of 0.5-1 mg/kgBW with a maximum daily dose of 60mg. Intravenous glucocorticoids (varying doses) were administered in 91.7 %. Mycophenolate mofetil (targeted daily dose of 2-3g) was administered to 83.8% and cyclophosphamide (500 mg biweekly for 6 infusions) to 16.2% of the placebo-treated patients respectively. Antimalarials (mainly hydroxychloroquine) were administered to 64.4%; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) to 65.6% respectively. CRR was achieved by 176/660 patients (26.7%), and PRR was achieved by 146/527 patients (27.7%) (Figure 1A). The expected differential response rate was 20%; the actual differential response rate was 7.5% (Figure 1B). Regarding safety, infections were observed in 46.4%, serious infections (requiring hospitalization) in 12%, malignancies in 0.2% and 29 patients died (2.88%). Figure 1<b>A.</b> Complete (CRR), partial (PRR) and overall (ORR) renal response at 48 to 52 weeks in patients who were treated with placebo and SoC. The fourth bar represents the percentage of placebo-treated patients who achieved the primary end-point as defined by each study. <b>B.</b> Expected and actual differential treatment effect. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Approximately 27% of the placebo (+SoC)-treated patients achieved complete renal response while more than half of them achieved an overall (CRR+PRR) renal response at 48 to 52 weeks in RCTs with biologics in LN. There was a significant discrepancy between the expected and actual differential treatment effect that raises significant points to consider for the design of future studies. <h3>REFERENCES:</h3> <b>NIL</b>. <h3>Acknowledgements:</h3> <b>NIL</b>. <h3>Disclosure of Interests:</h3> Ayesha Nomaan: None declared, Mahnoor Moin: None declared, Philippe Bilodeau: None declared, Konstantinos Tselios AstraZeneca, GSK, Roche, UCB, Novartis, AstraZeneca, GSK, Fresenius Kabi. © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,113
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,728

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,348 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesMême sujetBiomedical Ethics and RegulationTravaux en français237 207