MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411410187 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.06.1445

ABS0902 DEUCRAVACITINIB IN PLAQUE PSORIASIS: IMMUNE RESPONSE TO AND SAFETY OF PNEUMOCOCCUS AND TETANUS TOXOID VACCINES IN THE POETYK LTE TRIAL

2025· article· en· W4411410187 sur OpenAlexaff
Joanna Narbutt, Samantha E. Jacobs, Krisztián Papp, Alessandra Alió, Yi Luo, Yu Shao, Victoria Berger, C. Daamen, Kevin Winthrop

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiquePsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Établissements canadiensProbity Medical ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineToxoidTetanusImmune systemImmunologyPsoriasisPlaque psoriasisVaccination

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. Deucravacitinib is also in development for treatment of psoriatic arthritis (phase 3), Sjögren's syndrome (phase 3), systemic lupus erythematosus (phase 3), and discoid lupus erythematosus (phase 2). Deucravacitinib safety and efficacy were maintained through 4 years in the phase 3 moderate to severe plaque psoriasis POETYK PSO long-term extension (LTE) (NCT04036435) trial. The effect of deucravacitinib treatment on immune response to vaccines has not been evaluated. Objectives: This POETYK PSO LTE substudy evaluated immune response to and safety of non-live pneumococcus (T-cell independent) and tetanus toxoid (T-cell dependent) vaccines in patients with plaque psoriasis receiving continuous deucravacitinib. Methods: Patients were required to have received open-label deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily for ≥1 year in POETYK PSO LTE prior to the vaccine substudy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to blinded deucravacitinib or placebo on Day 1 through Day 36 to assess immune response to vaccination. Pre-vaccination serum titers, vaccinations, and safety assessments were performed on Day 8, vaccine-related safety assessments were performed remotely on Day 18, and post-vaccination titers and safety assessments were performed on Day 36. Primary endpoint was serologic response to 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PPSV-23) and tetanus toxoid vaccine (TTV) on Day 36. Secondary endpoints included seroprotection and seroconversion in tetanus toxoid-specific antibody titers, immune response measured by antibody titers and opsonophagocytic activity, and safety. Results: Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics were similar across groups (deucravacitinib, n=28; placebo, n=25). Proportions of patients achieving serologic response criteria to PPSV-23 (deucravacitinib, 85.7% vs placebo, 100.0%; difference [95% CI], -14.3% [-31.5%, 1.6%]) and TTV (deucravacitinib, 64.3% vs placebo, 80.0%; -15.7% [-37.3%, 8.6%]) were high in the deucravacitinib group and numerically lower than in the placebo group. Tetanus toxoid seroprotection (100.0% vs 100.0%; 0.0% [-12.1%, 13.3%]) was achieved by all patients. Seroconversion (64.3% vs 76.0%; -11.7% [-34.0%, 12.8%]) was numerically lower with deucravacitinib versus placebo, respectively. After adjusting for baseline titers, PPSV-23 and TTV mean titers at Day 36 were generally similar across both treatment groups. Opsonophagocytic activity for pneumococcus serotypes was comparable in both groups at Day 36. Adverse events (AEs) were infrequent and comparable across groups; no severe or serious AEs were reported. No clinically meaningful changes in laboratory parameters related to study treatment were observed. Conclusion: In patients with plaque psoriasis, continuing deucravacitinib treatment did not impact humoral immune responses to the PPSV-23 (T-cell independent) and TTV (T-cell dependent) vaccines. Our data suggest that withholding deucravacitinib treatment at the time of these vaccinations is not required. REFERENCES: NIL . Acknowledgements: This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Ann Marie Fitzmaurice, PhD, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Disclosure of Interests: Joanna Narbutt AbbVie, Amgen, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, Sandoz, Takeda, and UCB, AbbVie, Amgen, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, Sandoz, Takeda, and UCB, AbbVie, Amgen, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, Sandoz, Takeda, and UCB, Shahram Jacobs Bristol Myers Squibb, Kim Papp AbbVie, Acelyrin, Akros, Alumis, Amgen, Arcutis, Bausch Health/Valeant, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Can-Fite Biopharma, Celltrion, Concert Pharmaceuticals, Dermavant, Dermira, DICE Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Evelo Biosciences, Forbion, Galderma, Horizon Therapeutics, Incyte Corporation, Janssen, Kymab, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Leo Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mitsubishi Pharma, Nimbus Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Reistone, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, Sandoz, Sun Pharma, Takeda, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, UCB Pharma, and Zai Lab, AbbVie, Acelyrin, Akros, Alumis, Amgen, Arcutis, Bausch Health/Valeant, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Can-Fite Biopharma, Celltrion, Concert Pharmaceuticals, Dermavant, Dermira, DICE Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Evelo Biosciences, Forbion, Galderma, Horizon Therapeutics, Incyte Corporation, Janssen, Kymab, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Leo Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mitsubishi Pharma, Nimbus Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Reistone, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, Sandoz, Sun Pharma, Takeda, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, UCB Pharma, and Zai Lab, AbbVie, Acelyrin, Akros, Alumis, Amgen, Arcutis, Bausch Health/Valeant, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Can-Fite Biopharma, Celltrion, Concert Pharmaceuticals, Dermavant, Dermira, DICE Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Evelo Biosciences, Forbion, Galderma, Horizon Therapeutics, Incyte Corporation, Janssen, Kymab, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Leo Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mitsubishi Pharma, Nimbus Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Reistone, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, Sandoz, Sun Pharma, Takeda, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, UCB Pharma, and Zai Lab, Alessandra Alio Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol Myers Squibb, Yi Luo Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol Myers Squibb, Yanqiu Shao Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol Myers Squibb, Victoria Berger Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol Myers Squibb, Carolin Daamen Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol Myers Squibb, Kevin L. Winthrop AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB; Research support: Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer. © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases→Même sujetPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis→Travaux en français237 207→