MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411411135 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.06.220

POS0864 ACHIEVEMENT OF REMISSION DEFINED BY ABSENCE OF OBJECTIVE SIGNS OF INFLAMMATION VERSUS ASDAS INACTIVE DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS TREATED WITH BIMEKIZUMAB: 52-WEEK RESULTS FROM TWO PHASE 3 STUDIES

2025· article· en· W4411411135 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Rudwaleit, H. Marzo-Ortega, V. Taieb, D. Voiniciuc, A. Marten, George Stojan, M. Kim, L.S. Gensler

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAxial spondyloarthritisInflammationInternal medicineDiseaseRheumatologyPhysical therapyGastroenterology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory disease, mainly affecting the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) and spine. Bimekizumab (BKZ) is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A. BKZ has demonstrated sustained efficacy and safety to Week 52 in patients across the full spectrum of axSpA in the phase 3 studies BE MOBILE 1 (non-radiographic [nr-]axSpA) and BE MOBILE 2 (radiographic [r-]axSpA) [1]. Achievement of remission is a treatment goal and may guide clinical decisions [2, 3]. There is currently no universally accepted definition of remission in axSpA for use in research and routine clinical practice [4]. Assessing remission using objective signs of inflammation (OSI) may provide a clearer picture of inflammatory disease activity without subjective criteria. Previous analyses have shown that higher proportions of patients receiving BKZ achieved remission based on OSI (MRI remission of the SIJ and spine, C-reactive protein [CRP] ≤5 mg/L and a swollen joint count [SJC] of 0) compared with Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score <1.3 (ASDAS Inactive Disease [ID]) criteria in BE MOBILE 1 and 2 [5]. Objectives: To report achievement of a broader definition of OSI remission (using the previously used definition above, with the addition of absence of uveitis flares) in patients with axSpA compared with an established endpoint, ASDAS ID. Methods: BE MOBILE 1 (NCT03928704) and BE MOBILE 2 (NCT03928743) comprised 16-week double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled periods followed by 36-week maintenance periods. Patients were randomised to subcutaneous BKZ 160 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or PBO, with all patients receiving BKZ from Week 16 onwards. Remission of OSI comprised MRI remission of the SIJ and spine (MRI Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] SIJ score <2 and Berlin MRI spine score ≤2), CRP ≤5 mg/L, SJC of 0 and no uveitis flares from baseline to Week 52. The proportion of patients from the BE MOBILE 1 and 2 MRI sub-studies achieving these criteria was compared with those achieving ASDAS ID. No formal statistical analyses were conducted, and observed case (OC) data are reported. Results: Of 586 patients enrolled in BE MOBILE 1 and 2, 291 patients from their MRI sub-studies were included in this analysis. Levels of OSI at baseline were similar across treatment arms in patients with nr-axSpA and r-axSpA, respectively (Table 1). Overall, of pooled patients enrolled in the MRI sub-studies across BE MOBILE 1 and 2, 63/153 (41.2%) BKZ-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 16, compared with 28/153 (18.3%) achieving ASDAS ID. 17/103 (16.5%) PBO-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 16, compared with 6/103 (5.8%) achieving ASDAS ID. 68/139 (48.9%) BKZ-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 52, compared with 40/139 (28.8%) achieving ASDAS ID. Having switched to BKZ at Week 16, 37/93 (39.8%) PBO-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 52, compared with 39/93 (41.9%) achieving ASDAS ID (Figures 1A–1B). Separately, among patients with nr-axSpA, 31/74 (41.9%) BKZ-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 16, compared with 16/74 (21.6%) achieving ASDAS ID. 10/59 (16.9%) PBO-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 16, compared with 5/59 (8.5%) achieving ASDAS ID. 32/63 (50.8%) BKZ-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 52, compared with 22/63 (34.9%) achieving ASDAS ID. Having switched to BKZ at Week 16, 19/54 (35.2%) PBO-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 52, compared with 21/54 (38.9%) achieving ASDAS ID (Figures 1C–1D). In patients with r-axSpA, 32/79 (40.5%) BKZ-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 16, compared with 12/79 (15.2%) achieving ASDAS ID. Among PBO-randomised patients, 7/44 (15.9%) achieved remission of OSI at Week 16, compared with 1/44 (2.3%) achieving ASDAS ID. 36/76 (47.4%) BKZ-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 52, compared with 18/76 (23.7%) achieving ASDAS ID. Having switched to BKZ at Week 16, 18/39 (46.2%) PBO-randomised patients achieved remission of OSI at Week 52, compared with 18/39 (46.2%) achieving ASDAS ID (Figures 1E–1F). Conclusion: A higher proportion of patients receiving BKZ achieved remission based on OSI compared with ASDAS ID criteria across the full disease spectrum of axSpA. This highlights the potential limitations of using ASDAS ID alone to assess treatment efficacy. These findings underscore the need for further research to improve endpoints in axSpA. REFERENCES: [1] Baraliakos X. Ann Rheum Dis 2024;83:199–213. [2] Smolen JS. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:3–17. [3] Ramiro S. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:19–34. [4] Baraliakos X. J Rheumatol 2018;45:153–7. [5] Gensler LS. ACR 2024 [2362]. Acknowledgements: Funded by UCB. Medical writing support provided by Costello Medical and funded by UCB. Disclosure of Interests: Martin Rudwaleit Speakers bureau from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Consultant of AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis and UCB, Helena Marzo-Ortega Speaking honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and UCB, Consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and UCB, Research grants from Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Vanessa Taieb Shareholder of UCB, Employee of UCB, Diana Voiniciuc Contractor for UCB and employee of Veramed, Alexander Marten Employee of UCB, George Stojan Employee of UCB, Mindy Kim Employee of UCB, Lianne S Gensler Consulting fees from Acelyrin, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Grants from UCB paid to institution. © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,033

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,004
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,334
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases→Même sujetFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research→Travaux en français237 207→