MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411424561 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.06.1840

ABS0383 PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS EXPOSED TO VOCLOSPORIN: A SUMMARY OF AVAILABLE DATA FROM CLINICAL TRIALS AND POST-MARKETING SOURCES

2025· article· en· W4411424561 sur OpenAlexaff
Eugenia Yupei Chock, Tahmina Begum, Kim Dao, Chunhua Zhou, M. Dardeno

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePregnancy and Medication Impact
Établissements canadiensAurinia (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePregnancyClinical trialFamily medicineMedical physicsObstetricsIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Published data suggest active lupus nephritis (LN) in pregnancy is strongly associated with poor maternal and fetal outcomes, including renal flare, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, newborn prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation, and spontaneous miscarriage [1, 2]. Pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and active LN have demonstrated a 6-fold increase in fetal loss and a 3-fold increase in poor pregnancy outcomes compared to patients with SLE without a history of LN [3]. Therapeutic agents including mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), commonly used in LN, have also been linked to birth defects and pregnancy loss. Therefore, it is necessary to carefully balance disease control with pregnancy management, to minimize potential harm to the fetus. Voclosporin, a second generation calcineurin inhibitor, was approved for use in active LN in the United States in January 2021, the European Union in September 2022, and Japan in 2024. Per the approved labeling in the US and European Union, use in pregnant women should be avoided[4, 5]. The approved Japanese label states voclosporin should be administered to pregnant women or women suspected of being pregnant only if the expected therapeutic benefit is thought to outweigh any possible risk [6]. In embryofetal developmental studies of pregnant rats and rabbits during the period of organogenesis, no treatment-related fetal malformations were observed [4]. During the clinical development program of voclosporin, patients were excluded if pregnant, breastfeeding, or if they were of childbearing potential and not using adequate contraceptive precautions. Available data on the use of voclosporin in pregnant patients are insufficient to assess the drug-associated risk for adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. There have been reports of pregnancy in patients exposed to voclosporin during clinical trials and in the post-marketing setting. Objectives: Our objective was to describe the available pregnancy outcomes following voclosporin exposure from these sources. Methods: Data were collected from the voclosporin clinical trials (plaque psoriasis [NCT00244842], uveitis [NCT01243983], and LN [AURA-LV, NCT02141672; AURORA 1, NCT03021499]) and the Aurinia Safety Database containing post-marketing/spontaneous reports of pregnancy up to December 31 st , 2024. Results: A total of 66 pregnancies in 64 female patients of child-bearing age have been reported from the clinical development program and post-marketing reports with voclosporin. Clinical Trials During the clinical development program for voclosporin, ten pregnancies in ten patients were reported. Consistent with the study protocols, all patients discontinued voclosporin when pregnancy was detected. Five patients treated with voclosporin became pregnant during the clinical trials for plaque psoriasis and uveitis. Four resulted in live births, and the fifth pregnancy was lost to follow-up and later reported as terminated with no further information available. Five pregnancies were also reported during the clinical trials for LN. Of these cases, three ended with elective abortion, one was lost to follow up, and one pregnancy resulted in a live birth. Post-marketing reports As of December 31 st , 2024, 56 reports of pregnancy in 54 LN patients treated with voclosporin in the United States have been received. Pregnancy outcomes were not available in the majority of the reports (68%, n=38). Of the remaining 18 reports, ten ended with miscarriage (including one patient who had two miscarriages), three with elective abortion, and one with stillbirth; four pregnancies resulted in live births. No congenital anomalies were reported when pregnancy outcomes were provided. Conclusion: Active LN in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, and observations from this limited cohort reflect the overall challenges faced by female patients of child-bearing age with active LN. The limited data presented here are insufficient to draw conclusions regarding the use of voclosporin during pregnancy, and additional research is needed to better characterize maternal and fetal outcomes following voclosporin exposure. REFERENCES: [1] Clowse ME. Rheum Dis Clin North Am . May 2007;33(2):237-52. [2] Tan B, So PN, Krishnan A, et al. 2023;5(11):100724. [3] Lucas A, Eudy AM, Gladman D, et al. Lupus . Oct 2022;31(11):1401-1407. [4] LUPKYNIS [package insert]. Rockville, MD: Aurinia Pharma US, Inc.; 2021. Revised: 4/2024. [5] LUPKYNIS [SmPC]. Windsor, UK; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals (UK) Ltd.; 2022. Revised: 8/20/2024. [6] LUPKYNIS [package insert]. Tokyo, Japan; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.; 2024. Acknowledgements: NIL . Disclosure of Interests: Eugenia Yupei Chock: None declared, Tasim Begum Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Kathryn Dao Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Catherine Zhou Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Michelle Dardeno Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,059

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0050,006
Bibliométrie0,0040,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,212
Tête enseignante GPT0,433
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases→Même sujetPregnancy and Medication Impact→Travaux en français237 207→