MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411424563 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.06.1794

ABS1149 INTERIM ANALYSIS OF A EUROPEAN REAL-WORLD STUDY ON THE EFFECTIVENESS, PHYSICIAN SATISFACTION, AND PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS TREATED WITH BIMEKIZUMAB: INSIGHTS FROM GERMANY, SPAIN, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM

2025· article· en· W4411424563 sur OpenAlexaffabout
D. Poddubnyy, X. Baraliakos, Sizheng Steven Zhao, Clementina López‐Medina, Isabel Truman, Di Twigg, Henri Besson, H. Roqué

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInterim analysisAxial spondyloarthritisFamily medicineInterimPatient satisfactionAlternative medicinePhysical therapyAnkylosing spondylitisInternal medicineSurgeryPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Bimekizumab (BKZ) is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A and has demonstrated long-term clinical efficacy and safety in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) [1, 2]. BKZ was approved for the treatment of axSpA in Europe in 2023 [3]. Real-world research can complement findings from randomised controlled trials by evaluating the effectiveness of treatments in a broader population. Objectives: To assess effectiveness, patient characteristics, treatment history, disease severity, and physician satisfaction among patients with axSpA treated with BKZ, from a real-world cross-sectional study. Methods: Interim data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World BKZ axSpA Plus Disease Specific Programme™, an ongoing cross-sectional survey, with elements of retrospective data collection, from both rheumatologists and their consulting patients with axSpA undergoing BKZ treatment. This is a multinational survey being conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, Japan, and the United States of America. Data collection began in July 2024, following a staggered approach by country based on BKZ reimbursement, and is expected to be complete in February 2026. Rheumatologist-reported interim data from Germany, Spain and the UK is presented in this abstract. Rheumatologists reported details of demographics, treatment history, perceived overall disease severity, and their own satisfaction with the control provided by BKZ. Rheumatologist-perceived disease severity at the time of data collection (‘currently') and retrospectively at the point of initiating the current treatment was physician-judged with no clinical definition applied. Rheumatologists may have considered multiple factors when subjectively assessing a patient's disease. Rheumatologist-reported severity and treatment satisfaction data were stratified by BKZ treatment duration (<3 months, 3–6 months, >6 months). No inclusion criteria relating to treatment duration were imposed. All analyses were descriptive and data were reported as observed; no imputation of missing values was performed. Results: Demographics, disease duration and treatment history for all patients with axSpA treated with BKZ (n=325) are described in the Table 1. The sample was comprised of patients from Germany (40%), Spain (29%) and the UK (31%), with an almost equal split of patients diagnosed with radiographic (r-) axSpA (53%) and non-radiographic (nr-) axSpA (47%). Participating rheumatologists (n=73) reported all patients to have moderate-to-severe disease at BKZ initiation (Figure 1A). At the most recent consultation, in patients who had been prescribed BKZ for <3 months, 3–6 months or >6 months, 26%, 63% and 72%, respectively, were perceived to have mild disease. In patients who had received at least 3 months of treatment, only 2% were perceived as having severe disease. At this same consultation, in patients who had been prescribed BKZ for <3 months, 3–6 months, or >6 months, 93%, 93% and 97% of physicians, respectively, reported to be satisfied or very satisfied with treatment (Figure 1B). Conclusion: In real-world settings, physician-perceived disease severity was seen to improve in patients with axSpA treated with BKZ, even when prescribed for less than three months, with sustained treatment of three months or more yielding the largest improvements. Nearly all rheumatologists were satisfied with the control over axSpA provided by BKZ in their patients, with the highest level of physician-reported satisfaction (97%) observed in the group treated for more than 6 months. These findings confirm the effectiveness of BKZ in axSpA in routine clinical practice. REFERENCES: [1] Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, Van der Heijde D, Van den Bosch F, Magrey M, Maksymowych WP, Tomita T, Xu H, Massow U, Fleurinck C, Vaux T. 2024. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2024;83:913-14. [2] Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, Dougados M, Gensler LS, Molto A, Ramiro S, Kivitz AJ, Poddubnyy D, Oortgiesen M, Vaux T, Fleurinck C. Arthritis & Rheumatology 2022;74(12):1943-58. [3] UCB Pharma S.A. Bimzelx© (bimekizumab): Summary of Product Characteristics. 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/hu man/EPAR/bimzelx (accessed: 28 November 2024). Table 1 . Acknowledgements: Data collection was undertaken by Adelphi Real World as part of an independent survey, entitled the BKZ axSpA Plus Disease Specific Programme (DSP™). The DSP is a wholly owned Adelphi product and is the intellectual property of Adelphi Real World. The analysis described here were funded by UCB and used data from the Adelphi BKZ axSpA Plus DSP. UCB was one of multiple subscribers to the DSP and did not influence the original survey through either contribution to the design of questionnaires or data collection. Publication coordination was provided by Costello Medical and supported by UCB. Disclosure of Interests: Denis Poddubnyy Speaker for AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Consultant for AbbVie, Biocad, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, MSD, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis and UCB, Grant/research support from AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer, Xenofon Baraliakos Paid instructor for AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Speakers bureau from AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Grant/research support from Abbvie, Celltrion, Janssen and Novartis, Steven Zhao Speaker for Novartis, UCB, AlfaSigma and AbbVie, Consultancy for Novartis, UCB, AlfaSigma and AbbVie, Clementina López-Medina Speakers bureau for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis and UCB, Consultant for Eli Lilly, Novartis and UCB, Grant/research support from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis and UCB, Isabel Truman Employee of Adelphi Real World, Dan Twigg Employee of Adelphi Real World, Hervé Besson Shareholder of UCB, Employee of UCB, Helena Roque Employee of UCB. © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,059

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,014
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases→Même sujetSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→