Microporous Tape and Post Surgical Scars
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Post-surgical hypertrophic scars (HTS) are a common complication following surgical procedures, often leading to aesthetic concerns, functional impairments, and patient dissatisfaction. Various scar management techniques have been explored, but microporous tape has emerged as a simple, cost-effective, and non-invasive intervention that may reduce scar severity by minimizing mechanical tension and maintaining an optimal wound-healing environment. Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of microporous tape in improving scar characteristics and scar pliability in patients with post-surgical hypertrophic scars. Subjects and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with Forty Four patients (19 Males and 25 Females) with post-surgical HTS were selected from AGA hospital and randomly distributed into two equal groups.Group A (Microporous tape group) received Microporous tape in addition to traditional physiotherapy (Deep friction massage and stretching exercises).Group B (Control group) received traditional physiotherapy (deep friction massage and stretching exercises). The treatment was given 3 sessions per week for eight weeks. Outcome measures: They were assessed with Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) for scar severity and A Schiotz tonometer device for scar pliability. All measures were taken before and after 8 weeks. In Group A, microporous tape was applied directly over the scar and worn continuously for the duration of the study. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that Group A demonstrated significantly greater improvements in VSS scores (p = 0.001) and scar pliability (p = 0.001) compared to Group B. Scar remodeling was improved in the microporous tape group due to reduced stiffness, which is associated with better collagen organization and regulation of fibroblast activity. Conclusion: Microporous tape is an effective additional treatment for hypertrophic scars that develop after surgery, according to the results. It shows promise as an alternative to conventional scar care methods due to its ability to decrease scar tension, increase scar pliability, and improve scar aesthetics. Microporous tape is a suitable addition to post-operative care procedures because it is inexpensive and simple to apply. Additional studies should be conducted to investigate the effects over the long term and to compare it to other scar-modulating treatments
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».