ABS1194-HPR INVESTIGATION OF BALANCE AND CORE ENDURANCE IN PATIENTS WITH FIBROMYALGIA SYNDROME
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Fourty five % of Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) patients was reported to complain of balance impairment that may be due to sensory deficits, cognitive impairment and clinical symptoms such as pain, sleep problems, fatigue, muscle weakness. Although there are studies on the relationship between balance problems and core stability, there are no studies evaluating core stability in patients with FMS to the authors' knowledge. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare core endurance and balance in patients with FMS with healthy subjects and to evaluate the relationship between core endurance and balance. Methods: The study included 44 FMS patients and 44 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Demographic data of the participants were recorded. Then, core endurance was assessed with McGill core endurance tests, balance was evaluated with HUR BTG4 Balance Master System and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and function was assessed with Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Results: The assessment parameters were completed by all participants in the study. There was no significant difference between patients with FMS and healthy controls in demographics (p>0.05). There were significant differences between the BBS and static and dynamic balance assessments between the groups (p<0.05). A significant difference was found in the trunk extension and prone bridge tests of static core endurance tests and BBS in patients with FMS compared to the control group (p<0.001). There was a moderate negative correlation between side bridge test- right and eyes closed balance test in stable platform-velocity measurement (r=-0.309, p=0.042). Significant correlations were found between BBS and eyes closed balance test in unstable platform- area (r=0.328, p=0.030) and eyes closed balance test in unstable platform- length (r=0.329, p=0.029). Conclusion: Patients with FMS was concluded to have impaired core endurance and balance compared to healthy subjects. However, static and dynamic balance and core endurance tests were not significantly correlated in patients with FMS. This may be interpreted that balance does not affect the decreased core endurance in patients with FMS. Further studies should investigate the factors affecting core endurance in FMS patients. REFERENCES: [1] Tas NP, Baykara RA, Erdal A, Kal GA. Relationship Between Balance and Vitamin D in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study with HUR BTG4 Balance Master System®. SN Compr Clin Med. 28 Eylül 2023;5(1):233. [2] Sindwani D, Kaur M. A comparison of core muscle endurance of females with fibromyalgia versus healthy females: An observational study. Revista Colombiana de Reumatología [İnternet]. 2023. Acknowledgements: NIL . Disclosure of Interests: None declared . © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».