MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411433754 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.05.695

POS0308 HEMODYNAMIC FORCES: A NOVEL CARDIAC MRI PARAMETER TO ASSESS CARDIAC INVOLVEMENT IN SARCOIDOSIS PATIENTS

2025· article· en· W4411433754 sur OpenAlexaff
A. KANTE, A. Afana, D. Sène, S. Toupin, C. Baladi, R. Mirailles, K. Champion, V. Pagis, W. Bigot, V. Delcey, A. Lopes, R. Burlacu, Asmaa Tazi, B. Crestani, Stéphane Mouly, Paul-Jun Martial, Loïc Bière, T. Gonçalves, Jean‐Guillaume Dillinger, P Henry, V. Bousson, Théo Pezel, C. Comarmond

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
Établissements canadiensArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCardiac sarcoidosisSarcoidosisHemodynamicsCardiologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an underdiagnosed condition characterized by the formation of non-caseating granuloma in the myocardium, potentially leading to arrhythmia, acute heart failure, and sudden cardiac death [1, 2]. Early diagnosis of CS is crucial to optimize treatment and delay disease progression. Hemodynamic forces (HDFs) measure the global force exchanged between blood volume and myocardium during cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and are a novel noninvasive parameter for detecting early cardiac dysfunction [3]. However, HDFs have not yet been studied in patients with suspected CS. Objectives: To investigate left ventricle (LV) HDFs in suspected CS compared to healthy controls (HC). Additionally, to evaluate the diagnostic role of HDFs in differentiating between confirmed CS and non-CS patients within the suspected CS group. Methods: In a single-center study, patients with suspected CS and biopsy-proven sarcoidosis were included and underwent a 1.5T CMR exam. These patients were matched with healthy controls of the same age and sex who also underwent a CMR exam. HDFs were obtained for the entire cohort using advanced post-processing software. In sarcoidosis patients, cardiac involvement was confirmed using the WASOG (World Association for Sarcoidosis Other Granulomatous diseases) 2014 criteria [4], which notably include the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), patchy uptake on cardiac FDG-positron emission tomography, and perfusion defects on cardiac scintigraphy. The performance of HDFs for diagnosing CS among sarcoidosis patient was assessed using a logistic regression model using 3 HDFs parameters: LV systolic peak, LV longitudinal force and LV impulse and adjusted for the presence of LGE. Results: Among 45 sarcoidosis patients with suspected CS, 60% had a confirmed-CS using the WASOG criteria (Figure 1); 22% had a positive cardiac FDG-PET, 11% had scintigraphy perfusion defects and 85% had LGE. In this population, systolic and diastolic HDFs were significantly altered compared to HC (LV impulse, p=0.045; LV systolic ratio, p=0.018; LV systolic-diastolic-transition, p=0.012; LV diastolic deceleration, p=0.013) (Figure 2). In sarcoidosis patients, LV strain and LVEF (median [IQR]) were not statistically different between CS (56 [53–60] %) and non-CS patients (60 [55–64] %). However, HDFs parameters LV longitudinal force (p=0.041), LV impulse (p=0.018), and LV systolic peak (p=0.035) were significantly altered in confirmed-CS patients compared to non-CS patients. Furthermore, the combination of LV longitudinal force, LV impulse, and LV systolic peak enabled an accurate diagnosis of CS among sarcoidosis patients, with an AUROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic) of 0.88 (Figure 3). Conclusion: Sarcoidosis patients with suspected CS had altered hemodynamic forces compared to HC due to altered LV geometry and mechanics. Furthermore, hemodynamic forces were superior to traditional volumetric and functional CMR parameters (LVEF and strain) to predict cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis patients. REFERENCES: [1] Lehtonen J, Uusitalo V, Pöyhönen P, Mäyränpää MI, Kupari M. Cardiac sarcoidosis: phenotypes, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. European Heart Journal 2023; 44 :1495–1510. [2] Cheng RK, Kittleson MM, Beavers CJ, Birnie DH, Blankstein R, Bravo PE et al, on behalf of the American Heart Association Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2024:CIR.0000000000001240. [3] Vallelonga F, Airale L, Tonti G, Argulian E, Milan A, Narula J, Pedrizzetti G. Introduction to Hemodynamic Forces Analysis: Moving Into the New Frontier of Cardiac Deformation Analysis. JAHA 2021; 10 :e023417 [4] Judson MA, Costabel U, Drent M, Wells A, Maier L, Koth L, Shigemitsu H, et al. The WASOG Sarcoidosis Organ Assessment Instrument: An update of a previous clinical tool. Sarcoidosis Vasculitis and Diffuse Lung Diseases , 2014; 31; 19-2 Figure 1 Study flowchart depicting the selection and inclusion process. Abbreviations: CMR: cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; CS: cardiac sarcoidosis; HDF: hemodynamic forces. Figure 2Average longitudinal HDF in sarcoidosis patients with suspected-CS and healthy controls.Hemodynamic longitudinal force over the entire cardiac cycle comparison between sarcoidosis patients (blue) and healthy controls (red) using the average values of the entire cohorts. The vertical dotted line represents the end-systolic phase. *Systolic-diastolic transition and diastolic deceleration (in red rectangles) were both significantly altered in sarcoidosis patients compared to healthy controls. Abbreviations: HDF: hemodynamic forces; CS: cardiac sarcoidosis. Figure 3ROC curves of CMR-based HDF, LVEF and GLS for cardiac sarcoidosis diagnosis.The diagnostic performances standard CMR-assessed LVEF and GLS for evaluating CS was compared to 3 HDF parameters (LV systolic impulse, LV systolic peak, and LV longitudinal force). ROC curves were generated using a logistic regression model. The AUC of LVEF for CS diagnosis was 0.59 [95% CI: 0.24-0.95], while GLS had an AUC of 0.76 [95% CI: 0.24-0.94] and HDF an AUC of 0.88 [95% CI: 0.63-1.00]. Abbreviations: AUC: area under the curve. GLS: global longitudinal strain; HDF: hemodynamic forces; LV: left ventricle. LVEF: left ventricle ejection fraction; ROC: receiver operating characteristic. Acknowledgements: We thank the medical, paramedical and research staff of University Hospital of Lariboisiere (AP-HP, Paris, France). Aïcha Kante benefits from a grant from the Société Nationale Française de Medecine Interne (SNFMI) and the Filière des Maladies Auto-immunes et Auto-inflammatoires Rares (FAI2R). Disclosure of Interests: None declared . © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,064
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,293 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesMême sujetSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity ResearchTravaux en français237 207