Equipping community health workers in Rwanda to deliver a gender transformative parenting program to prevent violence against women and children at scale
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction In Rwanda, the Bandebereho program has demonstrated long-term reductions in intimate partner violence (IPV) and violence against children. Since 2019, the program has partnered with government to train community health workers (CHWs) to deliver at scale. Evidence on how to equip CHWs to deliver Bandebereho, or similar programs, with quality and fidelity is needed to support scaling. This study sought to assess the impact of training on CHWs and their capacity to deliver Bandebereho during scale up. Methods A pre/post, follow-up study was conducted with 573 CHWs in Burera district. Data were collected at three time points over 20 months using self-administered questionnaires (pre/post) and a follow-up phone survey. Questionnaires gathered data on CHW attitudes about gender roles and violence, self-reported skills, knowledge and confidence to implement Bandebereho, and training impacts on partner relations and community work. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Results The pre-survey was completed by 562 CHWs and 564 CHWs completed the post-survey after six to nine months. The phone survey was administered to 506 CHWs at follow-up (at 17–19 months). Analysis of changes between pre- and post-surveys found CHWs had more equitable gender attitudes after the training. Linear regression analysis found that CHWs with some secondary education (coefficient: −2.15, p < 0.01) and more than three years' experience (coefficient: −2.27, p < 0.001) were less likely to hold inequitable attitudes. At post-survey, CHWs reported a high level of preparedness to implement, regardless of gender. A majority reported improved partner relations, including greater partner support for their community work. At follow-up, a majority of CHWs reported a high degree of comfort and confidence implementing Bandebereho, and benefits to their work and personal relationships. Conclusions The findings highlight the importance of investing in high-quality facilitator training, which allows sufficient time for facilitators' own transformation, to maintain quality and fidelity at scale. The findings underscore the importance of a slow and steady approach, with sufficient time to adapt, test, and refine IPV programs for scale, which can also support a progressive handover to government. The findings may support program originators who seek to scale proven IPV prevention programs with government in other settings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle