Attenuation of Cardiovagal Baroreflex Gain Resetting During Isometric Handgrip Exercise in Patients With Fontan Circulation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Exercise intolerance is hallmark in patients with Fontan (FTN) circulation and may be attributed to low baroreflex sensitivity and thus, a low heart rate response for a given exercise intensity. Whether resetting of the cardiovagal baroreflex gain during exercise in FTN is attenuated remains unknown. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that the increase in heart rate from rest to exercise would be lower and cardiovagal baroreflex gain resetting attenuated in FTN. 23 patients with FTN (F = 11, M = 12; 14(4) yrs; BMI = 20(6)) were age- and sex-matched to 20 healthy controls (CTL; F = 7, M = 13; 14(4) yrs; BMI = 20(4)) who performed 2-min of isometric handgrip (IHG) exercise at 30-40% maximal voluntary contraction following 2-min of rest. Heart rate (electrocardiogram) and blood pressure (finger cuff photoplethysmography) were measured throughout. Cardiovagal baroreflex gain was determined using the spontaneous sequence method at rest and during IHG exercise. Sequences of 3 or more successive increases or decreases in SBP and heart rate (R-R interval) using a lag of 0, 1, or 2 cardiac cycles when r ≥ 0.7 were included. Comparisons were made using mixed-designs ANOVA or unpaired t-tests and the threshold for significance was set to P < 0.05. In FTN, 36(21) sequences/participant at rest and 35(12) sequences/participant during IHG exercise were analyzed. In CTL, 26(9) sequences/participant at rest and 39(13) sequences/participant during IHG exercise were analyzed. Resting heart rate (FTN = 76(13) vs CTL = 70(8) bpm , P = 0.2208) and SBP (FTN = 109(13) vs CTL = 106(14) mmHg, P = 0.7188) did not differ between groups. Despite similar increase of SBP from rest to IHG exercise (FTN = 5(6) vs. CTL = 8(8) ∆, P = 0.2014), the heart rate increase was attenuated in FTN relative to CTL (3(5) vs 15(10) ∆, P < 0.0001). At rest, cardiovagal baroreflex gain was lower in FTN relative to CTL (14.0(9.8) vs 24.4(6.3) ms/mmHg, P = 0.0001). Further, the baroreflex gain from rest to IHG exercise was attenuated in FTN compared to CTL (-0.2±5 vs. -9±8 ∆, P = 0.0001). The cardiovagal baroreflex gain and heart rate responses were negatively correlated in FTN (r = -0.68, P = 0.0003). Attenuated resetting of the cardiovagal baroreflex gain during exercise contributes to a blunted exercise heart rate in FTN. Heart and Stroke Foundation This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».