Harm reduction in photovoice knowledge mobilization with 2S/LGBTQ+ youth who use(d) drugs: A community showcase
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Photovoice, a participatory photography approach, is an action-oriented research methodology that is increasingly being taken up in research with equity-owed populations and related to sensitive topics. This includes scholarship and activism with people who use(d) drugs, for which there are important ethical and pragmatic considerations. Among these is the challenge of drawing attention to substance use-related inequities yet not causing harm in (mis)representing communities, above all when sharing participant-produced photography with wider public audiences, including via photovoice exhibits. In this commentary, we draw from our recent photovoice research with 2S/LGBTQ+ youth who use(d) drugs to recount our process of planning and hosting a community photovoice exhibit, with the aim of highlighting implications for harm reduction-oriented and youth-engaged knowledge mobilization. We begin by introducing our Youth Action Committee, comprised of nine transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming youth who use(d) drugs, while briefly tracing our group's history of collaboration leading up the 'Queer Eyes, Queer Lives' photovoice exhibit, with Vancouver's 2024 Queer Arts Festival. Next, we discuss our participatory and intentional approach to planning this community event, including the steps we took to increase accessibility and turnout (e.g., venue selection, strategic partnerships) and make the exhibit youth-friendly and engaging (e.g., hiring a DJ, providing food, enlisting Youth Action Committee members as speakers). We then detail our approach to promoting youth choice in selecting generative and non-harmful photographs for the exhibit, such as by using photo-rating and photo-release processes during study data collection and deliberating with the Youth Action Committee to choose exhibit photographs that could most appropriately and respectfully represent research participant's multiple lived realities. We couch this practical discussion within a broader conversation about resisting damage- and deficit-focused narratives in substance use research, highlighting our group's active efforts to shift such narratives by showcasing photography reflecting community resiliencies, strengths, joys, and politicalities. The parts and sum of this commentary provide direction for other activist-scholars seeking to create, share, and mobilize art in substance use research and community intervention, and we end the paper by encouraging others to reinterpret and build on our approach through their own work.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».