Examining Differences in Children’s Reported Exposure to Food Advertising in Amateur Sports Settings in Canada’s 2 Policy Environments: A Cross-Sectional Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Food marketing influences children's diet. Although food companies advertise to children via sports sponsorship, little research has examined this type of advertising. OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to describe and compare children's self-reported exposure to food advertising in amateur sports settings in 2 Canadian policy environments, including Quebec (QC; where sponsorship-related advertising directed to children younger than 13 years is regulated) and Ontario (ON; where there are no regulations). It was hypothesized a priori that reported exposure to food advertising would be lower among children younger than 13 years in QC. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional online survey. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: One thousand and twenty children aged 10 to 17 years living in ON and QC were recruited via a commercial panel from February to April 2023. Those who reported playing on a sports team outside of school (ON: n = 239; QC: n = 200) were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Children were asked to self-report exposure to food advertising when playing sports, including (1) signs, (2) branded sports equipment provided by their sports team, (3) branded awards, (4) free food, and (5) coupons or gift certificates. ANALYSIS: Logistic regression analysis was used to examine differences in reported exposure between provinces after adjusting for socioeconomic status and child age, sex, and race. Interaction terms were included to examine differences between age groups within and between provinces. RESULTS: The prevalence of reported exposure was highest for branded equipment (ON: 57%; QC: 44%) and signs (ON: 47%; QC: 43%), followed by branded prizes (ON: 30%; QC: 28%), free food (ON: 25%; QC: 27%), and coupons or gift certificates (ON: 26%; QC: 20%). The odds of reporting exposure to branded equipment were significantly lower among children in QC than those in ON (adjusted odds ratio 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.99; P = .049). No other differences in reported exposure, including differences between children aged 10 to 12 years in QC and other children, were found to be statistically significant for the above outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The study's findings suggest QC's advertising restrictions are not adequately protecting children from exposure to food advertising in amateur sports settings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».