MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411652984 · doi:10.18332/ejm/205283

Revisiting midwifery's identity: A crucial step to support access to continuity models of care

2025· editorial· en· W4411652984 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Journal of Midwifery · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiversity and Career in Medicine
Établissements canadiensNational Capital Commission
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContinuity of careIdentity (music)NursingObstetricsSociologyComputer scienceMedicinePolitical scienceHealth carePhilosophyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Globally, midwifery is at a pivotal moment.Leading international health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), and the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM), have recently published global position papers outlining the vital role and impact that midwives can have within healthcare systems, as well as the importance of investing in midwifery-led models of care 1-3 .In response to these calls to action, many countries are working to expand access to midwifery care.However, implementing these changes within existing systems may lead to confrontations, marginalization, and a dilution of midwifery's core philosophy and values.This should encourage midwives to come together and develop a collective sense of their profession and a shared vision.In the same vein as Gagnon and Lemay 4 , finding the most suitable words to describe how midwives navigate risks, uncertainties, and varied spaces, from sacred to medical, is essential to support the three pillars of the profession -educators, associations, and regulators -in defending autonomy and advancing the profession.In Canada, more than thirty years after its gradual legal recognition across the different provinces, midwives still navigate tensions between their community-based and personcentered roots and the institutional, biomedical and colonial systems in which they are required to practice.The profession was legalized based on the continuity model of care in response to pregnant individuals' reclamation of de-medicalization of childbirth and autonomy in perinatal care.In contrast with the international endorsement of midwiferyled continuity models, the sustainability of the Canadian model of care is under scrutiny by professional associations, research teams and governments 2,5,6 .Midwives across the country are reporting high burnout and attrition rates, which threaten workforce balance and equitable access to care 6 .These challenges are complex and systemic, and addressing them requires structural adjustments and a broader cultural and organizational transformation 6,7 .Policies must be adapted to reflect what matters to midwives and their clients rather than what fits the systems 8 .To respond meaningfully, we must deepen our understanding of midwifery's unique paradigm and professional values.This includes engaging midwives and the communities they serve in dialogue on what defines the midwives' identity.Throughout my fifteen years of involvement in midwifery activism -particularly as former president of the Regroupement Les sages-femmes du Qubec and a board member of the Canadian Association of Midwives -I have come to realize that clarifying and affirming our professional identity and articulating our distinct contributions at the local level is critical to resisting systemic pressures.This involves a deeper understanding of our societal mission, the necessary advocacy work, and the systems in which midwives are involved.In Quebec, the results of the Gagnon and Lemay 4 research project shape the profession's future and help ensure that innovative models of care and activities remain rooted in the specificity of the practice.Sustainability must resonate with a deep connection to why, how, and for whom we want to do this work individually and collectively.We invite midwives to undertake the overlooked yet essential task of articulating their local professional identity and reaffirming their specificity within the healthcare system and society.As seen in Canadian provinces and many countries, the dominant biomedical system can influence the profession in ways that erode midwives' deep sense of purpose and midwifery's capacity for systemic change.In today's global context, where reproductive rights are threatened and healthcare is increasingly fragmented, with an emphasis on risk management and performance indicators, engaging in this work through participatory research or other collaborative methods, is a recognition of midwives' distinctive

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,169
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0040,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,343
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Journal of MidwiferyMême sujetDiversity and Career in MedicineTravaux en français237 207