MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411665398 · doi:10.3389/fspor.2025.1645447

Editorial: Optimal physical activity across the lifespan for people of all abilities

2025· editorial· en· W4411665398 sur OpenAlexaff
David A. Hart, Ronald F. Zernicke

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Sports and Active Living · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpaceflight effects on biology
Établissements canadiensAlberta Bone and Joint Health Institute
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhysical activityPsychologyGerontologyCognitive psychologyDevelopmental psychologyMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Much of the focus on the benefits of exercise has been directed towards the elite athlete, pushing the boundaries of our genetic inheritance to higher and higher levels of accomplishment. Clearly the abilities of Olympic athletes are examples of this direction, as well as other amateur and professional athletes. These directions are dependent on intense exercise and training programs, as well as mental health, and they do provide new insights about the upper limits of human capabilities. They, however, can also have consequences such as injuries to tissues of essential physiological systems such as those of the musculoskeletal (MSK) system. In addition, a focus on only the extremes of exercise and functionality often loses sight of the fundamental premise that loading of our tissuesparticularly those of the MSK and cardiovascular systems-is essential for health, and thus important for everyone of all ages and abilities. While all humans benefit from physical activity, females and males and different races may differ regarding risks and benefits [7], so "one size may not fit all".In recent years, there has been a shift in many "modern" occupations from being physically demanding to prolonged periods of "inactivity" while sitting at a desk in front of a computer screen [reviewed in 8]. For example, children and adolescents sit in school much of the day or in front of their electronic devices, leading to extended periods of inactivity in otherwise healthy populations that are growing and maturing, and thus setting a suboptimal "baseline" for several physiological systems during a critical phase of life [9,10]! In addition to those populations, there may be others of different ages that have compromised abilities to perform exercise as a result of limited access to programs, physical limitations due to injury, developmental deficits, and/or chronic diseases or complications from lifestyle choices and their consequences. Such populations can still benefit from tailored, adaptive exercise programs that offer aerobic and/or resistive exercises +/-augmentation, which allow for maintenance of essential physiological systems.To address many of the issues and challenges to meet those needs in populations across a wide spectrum of abilities, this Special Collection of articles was conceived and complied. It consists of both original research reports and reviews. The collection of articles includes 11 peer-reviewed and accepted submissions, which provide excellent examples of how physical activity programs can provide benefits to specific populations ranging from the young to the elderly with and without specific limitations, as well those that are motivated to achieve excellence despite perceived limitations, such as in the Paralympics.The spectrum of articles in the Special Collection addresses several conditions, diseases, and circumstances that impact a wide variety of populations. Those include different types of exercise programs and activities that target specific populations such as neurodivergent children provides insights into some recently identified biomarkers in triathletes, and building on those results, it would be interesting in the future to investigate whether similar or different biomarkers are also identified as efficacy determinants for physical activity programs in some of the specific populations that are the focus of other articles in this Special Collection.In summary, the focus of this Special Collection is a series of articles, which address the need for and benefits of physical activity on populations across a wide spectrum of abilities. This collection is complementary to an earlier Special Collection we edited, which focused on the benefits of physical activity for those aspiring to the extremes of achievement [11]. Our intent is that this current Special Collection will highlight the need and benefits for Homo sapiens of all abilities to engage in physical activity and perhaps provide inspiration for some populations not covered in this collection to develop and implement specialized physical activity programs to enlist an even broader spectrum of positive health benefits for persons with abilities limited or challenged by circumstances.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,062
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in Sports and Active LivingMême sujetSpaceflight effects on biologyTravaux en français237 207