MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411730312 · doi:10.25040/ntsh2025.01.02

LOOKING AHEAD TO 2026

2025· article· en· W4411730312 sur OpenAlex
Оksana Zayachkivska, Ronnie Fass, A.M.L. Coenen, Sławomir Gonkowski, Mariia Liashenyk, A. M. Bekesevych, Liliia Nesterovska

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of the Shevchenko Scientific Society Medical Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueFood Quality and Safety Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear reader, We have entered the final year of the first quarter of the 21st century, which will be eternally marked by the catastrophic challenges linked to numerous global military conflicts and the COVID-19 pandemic. The medical effects of a full-scale war in Ukraine highlight the need for global awareness of the magnitude of the current issues [1; 2]. Discussing the medical and social aspects of these issues and their solutions became a priority topic in the Proceedings of the Shevchenko Scientific Society. Medical Sciences (Medical Sciences) from 2021 to 2024. I will share the outcomes of our work during this period and why it is crucial to consider today what our journal will look like in 2026.The editorial team of the Medical Sciences journal combines experience shaped by time-tested traditions, contemporary knowledge, innovations, and the passion of scientists and doctors. The newest groundbreaking technological solutions and the open-access format enable the immediate publication of Medical Sciences’ content on online scientific information platforms. Using the Scopus and CrossRef indexing tools, each publication swiftly transitions from one web page to another, aiding in its fast dissemination across the global scientific map [3]. Scientometric tools like CiteScore metrics, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), and Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) clearly show that the worldwide readership of Medical Sciences has doubled since 2019. Furthermore, forward-thinking scientific and medical communities worldwide are coming together to assist Ukrainians in making cutting-edge scientific and technological advancements. They are pleased to collaborate with the editorial team of the Medical Sciences. Our authors today span 25 countries worldwide. We express our gratitude to all our authors, especially those from Ukraine, who, under the most challenging circumstances, save lives, conduct research, provide treatment, develop and apply their knowledge and accomplishments in daily practice, and select Medical Sciences to share their achievements. This indicates that we can develop our journal through collaborative efforts.In 2024, the editorial team of the Medical Sciences received 97 manuscripts for publication and published 48 articles in the public domain. Despite the pandemic’s medical impacts and the challenging wartime conditions, the editorial board of Medical Sciences continues improving the process of preparing articles for publication. A team of reviewers, who are experts in scientific and medical practice, collaborates closely with the authors to prepare publications, enhancing them and their optimal format in line with contemporary principles of academic writing [3]. We are delighted to congratulate our reviewers, who dedicated themselves to enhancing the style and quality of publications from 2021 to 2024, and acknowledge the best ones with the “Top Reviewer” award.The growing interest in published articles globally is demonstrated by the enhanced citation of our journal’s articles in the Scopus international scientometric database. This characteristic indicates the quality of publications in the Medical Sciences, which is confirmed by the Q3 category assignment in the global ranking of academic journals.The articles produced by multidisciplinary and international author teams are an element of this success. Between 2023 and 2024, the number of publications in the Medical Sciences journal, supported by international grants and professional communication, rose by 30%. Fig. 1B presents the top publications in the Medical Sciences journal based on scientometric indexing in Scopus from 2019 to 2024 in the categories “Literature Review,” “Original Research,” “Brief Communications,” and “Meeting Report.”Beginning with the 2nd issue of 2024, the complete text of each publication in the Medical Sciences was published in both Ukrainian and English. This significantly increased interest in viewing and downloading articles. Another aspect is the broadening of scientific interests, which now encompasses significant issues in related fields, such as biotechnology, bioengineering, the application of artificial intelligence in public health, pharmacy, and cutting-edge medical technologies in healthcare. The editorial team of the Medical Sciences journal ranked publications using a relative index according to the number of views and downloads at the time they were published online [3]. Table 1 presents the most popular (top) publications in 2021–2024. We congratulate the author teams and invite you to spread the information about the recognition of your creative work by readers among colleagues and professional online platforms and depositories like LinkedIn and SciProfiles.Considering the expansion of scientific medical interests conducted by multidisciplinary teams and utilizing artificial intelligence capabilities, the Editorial Board of the Medical Sciences in 2025 included our authors and reviewers who led the following topics: “Medicine”— Walter Maksymovych (Canada) [4], “Medical Management and Clinical Pharmacy”— Andriy Zimenkovsky (Ukraine) [5], “Artificial Intelligence and Medicine”— Nataliia Shakhovska (Ukraine) [6], “Dentistry”— Olesia Martovlos (Ukraine) [7], along with renowned experts in innovative fields of modern medical science from Norway, Duan Chen and Chun-Mei Zhao [8].Promoting the journal’s articles on information platforms and within medical communities is another way to enhance its visibility in today’s scientific, academic, and medical landscape. Uliana Pidvalna (Ukraine) will act as the Deputy Editor-in-Chief of the Medical Sciences journal, focusing on innovations in professional and social media [9].Additionally, Dr. Zoryana Masna, the newly elected Chair of the Medical Commission of the Shevchenko Scientific Society and Professor and Head of the Department of Topographic Anatomy at Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, was invited to join the Editorial Board of the Medical Sciences journal.Preparing academic medical articles for global access according to the publication schedule during a full-scale war has become incredibly difficult. This is why the editorial team’s joint efforts and the medical community’s support are crucial. Disseminating knowledge of medical science and clinical practice propels human advancement. Despite the challenges, we remain optimistic about the future and are confident in growing the journal’s global readership and expanding our pool of authors. We believe that introducing new “Innovations”, “Medical Hypothesis” sections and increasing joint conferences under the Medical Commission of the Shevchenko Scientific Society, which would support strategically essential advancements in healthcare, will aid in the future growth of the Medical Sciences journal. We sincerely thank all members of the Editorial Board, production team, and reviewers for their volunteer work. See: Publications: https://mspsss.org.ua/index.php/journal Peer-review process: https://mspsss.org.ua/index.php/journal/peer-review For further professional collaboration, follow us on professional platforms: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-proceedings-of-the-shevchenko-scientific-society-medical-sciences/ and SciProfiles: https://sciprofiles.com/ After all, every issue of the Medical Sciences reports on the strength and invincibility of Ukraine!

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,204
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle